Wednesday, June 30th, 2010
17

'Twilight: Eclipse': But Can We Talk About the Wigs???

HAIRObviously I was taken to see Eclipse because my friend knows me well enough to know that, not only have I read the series, and seen the other movies, but I also have thoughts about both. Mostly these thoughts are about Mormon sexuality and anti-abortion propaganda, but also about how I give Robert Pattinson credit for wanting to be a good actor, and how I have nothing but empathy for how bonkers his life must be. Anyway, that's not what I want to talk about. What I want to talk about is wigs.

Because I'm pretty sure the wig that Kristen Stewart (who I also want to give credit (and a sandwich) to!) is wearing is the best wig I've ever seen. Remember how she cut her hair into that ugly mullet to play Joan Jett? Well, obviously Bella Swan has to be… I don't know, dreamy enough so that a werewolf will see her unborn daughter, who he will fall in love with STRAIGHT FROM THE WOMB, in her eyes and thus confuses his love for the pre-baby as love for the mother.

(Oh, uh, spoiler alert.)

It moves naturally-the wig, I mean. There's no clear distinction between the wig itself and the secondary hairline piece, and, it's the same color throughout the movie!

You'd think that's a given, right? Oh, but, it's not!

Other vampire's wigs change! They change color, and length, and sometimes they look a little crooked, all in the same movie! (Also: you could say the same for the accents. Carlisle has one now!)

Which would be fine, I guess, except that in movies there's supposed to be continuity. Also, because this movie is about intimacy and love, there's no medium shots, as noted. It goes from big wide scenery shots to close ups, with nothing in between, so you really have to look at all those bad wigs quite a lot.

Did they use up the make up budget on Bella's wig? That must be it, right? Because there is really no real reason why Emmett's hair is suddenly pitch black in the Big Battle Scene (between 5 or so werewolves and maybe 8 new-born vampires) and cut so as to make the beefy star look like some sort of Slavic Gentleman's Gentleman.

They didn't use up all the money going to Italy for three or four extraneous exterior shots (that was the second movie) and they didn't use up all make up budget on Charlie's mustache (When is someone going to give that actor some more work? He's so good!). So… what happened exactly?

I guess I'll just have to go see it again to figure it out for myself.



EA Hanks is wondering why we can have computer-generated wolves but not computer-generated hair?

17 Comments / Post A Comment

Same it ain't so.

Marah Eakin (#5,813)

Agree. You couldn't see the nets at all, which is something. The only scene where Bella's wig is HORRIBLE, I think, is the "fight training" scene, where it's pulled back and just looks super stringy and fake.

phlox (#204)

I'm wigging-out over the spoiler alert that comes after the actual spoiler!

Chris Tamigi (#5,377)

I've always thought these movies looked cheaply made what with the bad hair and makeup and all the scenes look like "go into the woods with a few teens and a camera and you got yourself a twilight"

HiredGoons (#603)

I also dislike the policies of Andrew Jackson!

Whoops, wrong room.

Traci Olsen (#5,808)

the hair is always bad. I don't know why. Why is their hair yellow? They have srsly tons of money, and the hairdresser won't care if their head is supercold.

But, yeah, Bella looked good, and I loves me some Charlie.

A.R. Chrisman (#2,964)

FIRST!

A.R. Chrisman (#2,964)

Fuck.

Peteykins (#1,916)

My favorite wig drama of all time was the recent-ish remake of Helter Skelter, wherein all the actresses were hilariously upstaged by their obviously terrible wigs. I honestly recommend watching it just for the hair.

Pmjoo (#5,363)

I think her hair looks so natural… because it's not a wig. New Moon and Eclipse were filmed back to back starting in March 2009. The Runaways began filming at the end of June 2009. It's very likely that it's not a wig at all.

Pmjoo (#5,363)

I can't believe I just publicly divulged that I know that much about Twilight/Kristen Stewart.

EvieZamora (#5,854)

Sorry, but you're wrong. There was a wig used as Kristen had to get her hair cut for the Joan Jett role, which was filmed before "Eclipse." "Eclipse" was filmed in August, not March.

E.A. Hanks (#4,535)

"Kristen Stewart Dishes On Her 'Eclipse' Wig; 'I Can Be Bella Without My Hair'"

http://hollywoodcrush.mtv.com/2010/03/15/kristen-stewart-eclipse-wig/

Nancy Nguyen (#6,052)

can we talk about the most obvious and f-ugly wig of all??? ALICE! not only does it look like someone just dumped a cheap wig over her wadded up real hair, it's not even a cute style!

This is so awesome. The spoiler alert part was dead on!!! I have had numerous arguments with my friends about this (they are team Jacob of course). I have argued that it was not Bella he was in love with at all so to want Bella to choose Jacob is CRAZY. Thanks for settling the matter (at least for me) so convincingly. Also, I thought all the wigs including Bella's were God awful.

Corolla (#245,070)

Obviously I was taken to see Eclipse because my friend knows me well enough to know that, not only have I read the series, and seen the other moviespenis3x

Post a Comment