Friday, February 18th, 2011
12

Britney Spears' "Hold It Against Me" Overanalyzed


Despite not liking Britney Spears’ album covers, I like her new video quite a bit. Yes, I hate the lyrics just as much as you do. The joke chorus is awful, and the verses are a string of clichés. But at least they’re not “I’m rich and in the club” clichés, like pretty much every other pop song released in the last three years. And anyway, the music is good enough. It’s a nice little trance-techno track that, released as an instrumental, would make people who like to go out and dance (not me) very happy indeed.

But I want to talk about the video, because there are a few dark and tantalizing things to talk about in there.

First (after the pointless meteor-striking-the-earth opening, which just seems like director Jonas Åkerlund jacking up the budget, and the “setup” shots, where she stands there like a wax dummy as the dancers assemble and the lights are set up, etc.) there’s the opening dance sequence, which is cut at epilepsy-inducing speed to camouflage the fact that Britney can’t really dance anymore. Watch it slowly, and you’ll see that she basically does one thing each time the camera’s on her. She’ll lift her arms over her head. Or cock her hip. Or turn her head to the right and look at one of the backup dancers who are whirling and thrusting around her. But more than one movement per one-second burst of digital video is beyond her capacity.

Britney seems to really be in her comfort zone when she’s in what I choose to call the “pedestal dress,” standing surrounded by a zillion video monitors, each showing one of her old videos. It’s like she lives in a private, self-sealing universe, forever haunted by her own past. (Aren’t we all? Each of us is forever confronted by images and memories of a younger self—sometimes these are happy memories, and other times they’re horrible, awkward things you did and said when you were a teenager that can still rocket you out of sleep, coated in sweat, even though you haven’t seen those people in a decade or more and they probably don’t even remember the thing that still stabs you in the brain. Oh, but YOU REMEMBER. See, Britney is just like us.)

The introduction of Space-Mutant Britney (her eyes have two irises! She has black glittery nail-claws! She lives in a porthole made of microphones, as though Britney Spears is someone from whom journalists clamor for quotes!) sends us right into the realm of J-pop. In fact, both this bit and the pedestal dress remind me of costumes Ayumi Hamasaki, the queen of J-pop, would wear.

Within the pedestal/monitor chamber of horrors, there are blind dancers. Have they blinded themselves to avoid having to stare at a million Britneys, endlessly? I don’t know, so let’s skip straight to the Britney-on-Britney fight scene, and the way it causes pedestal-dress Britney to collapse in a heap after spraying multicolored paint from her fingertips. What does this symbolize? Neither battling Britney seems particularly identified with an earlier phase in her career—it’s not Schoolgirl Britney vs. Toxic Britney or anything like that—so this whole bit is inexplicable.

But it could be seen as the inevitable result of staring at your own refracted image for a million years (or however long Britney has been trapped on that pedestal, surrounded by monitors)—eventually former aspects of yourself will attempt to seize control of your mind, and battle for dominance. It’s happened in a zillion sci-fi movies, and probably at least once in real life.

Finally, post-battle, post-collapse, we get yet another Britney, wearing some kind of pleather minidress and “dancing” (again, super quick cuts to camouflage her general lack of affect and atrophied skills) on a flame-shooting “rock concert”-style stage. Is this her fully actualized self? The winning persona coming to full life? If so, that gives the video an element of real tragedy. All that psychic struggle—Britney’s personalities beating the hell out of each other within her mind, as she stares into a soul-crushing vista of endless Britney-ness—and this is the result? This video makes me feel more sorry for her than any TMZ footage ever could.


Phil Freeman is the editor of Burning Ambulance and a freelance writer for the Village Voice and lots of other places. He will harangue you at great length about the superiority of Japanese pop if you let him.

12 Comments / Post A Comment

semiserious (#2,430)

I was watching the video last night during the commercials of 30 Rock and had to hit pause, and when I went back to look at it I found it stopped on this: bizarro Britney with enlarged Joker-looking mouth that is cut too fast to notice otherwise. It scared the bejesus out of me.

I'm also kind of surprised that in the wake of the "Born This Way" affair that no one has mentioned Madonna already did the whole "beating herself up" thing in the "Die Another Die" video (and, for that matter, Kelly Rowland did a dance battle against herself in her "Commander" video with the same color schemes).

Aatom (#74)

I wish we would all stop acting surprised when pop music reveals itself to be nothing but a series of mirrors held up against each other. If Madonna didn't do it before you, and you were born after 1980, then you're doing something wrong.

semiserious (#2,430)

I don't really find fault with it, but I was surprised I hadn't seen it pointed out (though, this is the only thing I've read about it besides random gay internet chatter).

I am trying to wonder what is all means. Then I realized its probably because pop ladies sometimes may want to feature cat fights in their videos but wouldn't dear dream of giving another chick a big role in THEIR video.

riggssm (#760)

I thought I was just having a nyquil-inspired, cold-related seizure when I saw this last night. Guess not.

KenWheaton (#401)

"I don’t know, so let’s skip straight to the Britney-on-Britney fight scene, and the way it causes pedestal-dress Britney to collapse in a heap after spraying multicolored paint from her fingertips. What does this symbolize?"

It symbolizes Katy Perry's videos.

LondonLee (#922)

Not a bad record (and vid) at all but I kept thinking it was a techno version of "If I Said You Had a Beautiful Body Would You Hold It Against Me?" which isn't a good thing.

Also, why is it four and a half minutes long? Damn kids these days don't know when to stop. Three minutes is all that needs.

TrilbyLane (#1,318)

appears that the Bellamy Brothers kept thinking so too:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1358803/Britney-Spears-faces-multi-million-dollar-lawsuit-accused-ripping-song-lyrics.html

(I like that Britney launched the video on twitter 'without further adieu'!)

Aatom (#74)

Anyone else notice the "Plenty of Fish" dating website that Ackerlund also used in the lesbian guard scene of Telephone?

Mirrors.

leroybanjo (#8,448)

@londonlee, more than not a good thing (and I can't say I agree with your "not a bad record/vid"). It's bad enough that hollywood has been co-opted by "what else can we plunder?" paeans to "artists" in the stan lee orbit. Now pop music has plumbed the expressive possibilities of…t-shirts from the 70's? I want to see the video to "I'm with stupid ->"…oh, wait. I just did.

Swass LikeMe (#1,317)

Eh. This is Britney in her comfort zone – commercial, disposable, replaceable. I (morbidly) hold out hope that she will hit ROCK-BOTTOM and write an album that parses her core.

Bob Constans (#9,989)

Harsh!
Kinder than I would be, tho. LOL
I ended up watching the vid with the sound off and Mott The Hoople's Golden Age Of Rock-n-Roll playing… it went disturbingly well together.

josh_speed (#97)

See, for me this video is Britney in her death throes. For me there is no meaning. It is just one set piece after another, burnt money, and I am sure G-d did not invent high-end compositing software for this purpose. Eck.

Post a Comment