Messy Lives Are Actually Not That Alluring, Katie Roiphe
Lock up your daughters: Kate Roiphe is waxing nostalgic again. In her latest paean to the Days of Wine and Date Rape, a piece in Sunday's New York Times entitled "The Allure of Messy Lives," Roiphe wonders if the popularity of the AMC series "Mad Men" is a sign that we all secretly miss the "fun" of swapping spouses, harassing employees, and getting blackout drunk at the office. In her usual "I'm just saying" style, Ms. Roiphe allows that "it's hard" to defend alcoholism and infidelity, (and "harder still" to defend the far greater sin of smoking,) but, in the name of eulogizing the vital "intensity" so many old, rich, white men once got out of abusing their wives, families, livers and lungs, she apparently felt compelled to do so.
According to Roiphe, those of us raised by alcoholic, philandering wife-beaters might think we're getting plenty of intensity out of, say, our marriages, or throwing dinner parties for our friends or taking vacations with our families, but what we're actually doing is living deluded, timid lives steeped in a "malaise and alienation" no better than Don Draper's. And yet we should envy him, for his struggle against "bourgeois ordinariness." Has she seen "Mad Men"? I'll admit that there are a few things I envy about Don Draper, but desultory sex in a shit-brown apartment with a hooker who smacks me in the face while my kids eat Thanksgiving dinner at their new Daddy's place isn't on the list. And is it anybody's idea of class struggle? Where does Katie Roiphe get this stuff?
The first answer seems to be: from her mother's Rolodex. In bolstering her case, she gathers an impressive array of two voices-both from her mother Anne's narrow circle of literary and media contemporaries-to sing the praises of the fun old days. And not just any voices, but ones that, when it comes to being mad men, make Don Draper look like Don Knotts. First up for the defense is none other than Gay Talese, author of Thy Neighbor's Wife, the notorious, near-career-killing, 1970's chronicle of the married father's own "casual research" into his effusive sexual entitlement.
Sounding like an aging Southern belle wistfully recalling the days of antebellum refinement, he remembers seeing "copy girls" slipping out of offices for trysts in hotels "with more than one man," and says, "You didn't have the word ‘exploitation' then. And mostly it wasn't exploitation." Well, I know I feel better. It wasn't "exploitation," it was fun! See, if only today's "copy girls" could shake off their prudish aversion to what Roiphe admiringly calls the "flagrant flirtation and cocktail party atmosphere of Sterling Cooper," they too might get lucky once in a while. Coercive, gang-bang lucky! Who doesn't miss that?
And today's straight-laced guys just need to get over their fear of alcohol-induced comas. Roiphe makes the point that if modern men would give in to "the glamour of spectacularly messy, self-destructive behavior," they might one day have memories as colorful as Talese's recollection of "coming back from lunch one day and seeing one guywith his head flat down on his typewriter. No one touched him for hours, and eventually he woke up." See! He woke up! Eventually. C'mon, you pantywaists-put down that infant son and try something really challenging, like typing with your face.
To be fair, Roiphe does describe modern life as "better, saner, more sensible," than it was in the early 1960's, but only to decry the "puritanical frisson" we get from feeling superior to the characters on "Mad Men." She doesn't do that argument any good, though, when, she quotes Jerry Della Femina, the advertising legend and publisher. It's in Della Femina's stories about the 60's that Roiphe notices the word "fun" coming up so often, and she worries that we're no longer "hanging out with the same boozy fluidity… the wild bursts of bad behavior" enjoyed by guys like Della Femina, who recently said about the Tiger Woods scandal, "let's face it, bimbo-gate is going to be gone and people will forget it…. Every one of these women look like they escaped from the bunny ranch in Nevada." Tiger was just having boozy, fluidy fun, people. Don't be such stick-in-the-muds.
Roiphe's final witness for the defense of terribleness is her mother, whose coming memoir, about "the literary circles orbiting the Paris Review," produces this lament from her daughter: "I was struck by how much these productive and famous people drank. Today we would dismiss all of these brilliant, narcissistic artists and writers as alcoholics, the word itself carrying its own antiseptic morality, its own irrefutable argument for balance and sobriety, but back then they were simply charismatic."
See, they weren't just productive, (by which I mean "until they died very young,") they were famous. And charismatic. What's a few marriages compared to an invitation to the Plimptons'? Just look at all the romance we've given up by using words like "alcoholic." It reeks of puritanical compassion for the sick, doesn't it? And dreary old notions about protecting their wives and children. I mean, how
un-Don Draper can you get?
Roiphe is titillated by a passage in her mother's book about parties where, "There was a flow to an evening, a sort of dangerous possibility in the air, that would be entirely foreign at the equivalent party now, at which most people go home with the person they are supposed to go home with." And this to me is the saddest thing about Roiphe's piece-how, well, sad it sounds. Where has she gotten the positively "Mad Men"-era idea that "embracing the responsibility" of marriage precludes a messy, exciting-sometimes even transcendentally so-life? Does Roiphe not get that, in her creaky old (and exceedingly bougie) critique of "bourgeois culture," she sounds like one of the be-goateed trust-funders Don meets during the first season of the show? Exactly which "bursts of bad behavior" on the part of "Mad Men"'s characters has she found so attractive? Has there ever been, for instance, a sex scene on the show that wasn't infused with nihilism, or dread? Has anyone at Sterling Cooper ever lifted a single martini glass in untroubled joy? Does Roiphe watch Betty Draper terrorize her children into gagging on their food and think "I want to be like her!"? I'm sure she doesn't. So how to explain her head-in-the sand reaction to "Mad Men"?
Yes, there is an ascetic streak running through our abs-obsessed culture, a puritanical strain in our devotion to wholesomeness. But I don't find Don Draper's behavior reprehensible because it violates some abstract, obsolete code set down by Cotton Mather on Plymouth Rock. I hate it because it hurts people for no good reason. The Don Drapers of the world, in their pursuit of the "dangerous possibility" Roiphe apparently is incapable of seeing in anything other than the treatment of women as disposable amusements, did a lot of damage, to a lot of people. One of the things that makes "Mad Men" so compelling is knowing that the damage that's coming for the characters will be redeemed, somewhat, by very brave people who see nothing sexy about suffering, and who doggedly pursue the dangerous possibility of meaningful lives. Katie Roiphe, as the incalculably lucky beneficiary of their legacy, should check out their stories sometime.
Peter Birkenhead is the author of the memoir Gonville.







I blame weed.
See, I was actually thinking that weed is maybe the best way to "wallow in the depravity of asceticism," as MrTeacup put it.
WE'RE puritanical, while the early 60's are the crucible of wanton libertinism?
I think I got up on the wrong side of the White Rabbit.
I do admire the brilliant subtext of Mad Men: that if you use the right furniture and costuming, you can get people to like anything.
And if the actors are pretty and charming!
And if the writing, direction, and storylines are really good.
Can someone tell me if there is a Mad Men spoiler in this, or is it just conceptual? I will wait over here ..
No spoiler.
(Thank you–you have no idea how difficult the Internet is when you are behind on Mad Men)
Good one, G Garcia!
Nice work, Peter, but The Awl is a dangerous place to go after smoking, so keep your head low for a few.
Oh, um, and drinking.
AND WHAT IS THIS TALK OF A MEANINGFUL LIFE
(Ok, I'll stop now).
Apologies to NVC (and apparently most of NYC) but enough about this show already.
agreed!
Yeah I don't mind a little water cooler talk but this has gone too far.
It's because Mad Men is really that good? Like, has beauty and brains? Imagine the television equivalent of Giselle with a PHd in semiotics.
ALSO the Boomers really love that someone has immaculately recreated their childhood.
"Oh, for the good old days before the tuberculosis vaccine, when poets wrote not in ink but expectorated blood!"
this
"Back then, they were simply colorful."
I really want to type a nicely articulated response here, but I guess it's this instead: I don't think you have to condone the rotten aspects of the main characters' personalities to entertain the idea that a lot of them appear to be having way more fun than our sorry present corporate lot.
Right, I wouldn't want to be a borderline alcoholic divorced father who has lied about his entire life and treats women like shit, but I would LOVE to attend Mad Men-esque office party.
"Entertain" is exactly the right word. Like any fantasy, Roiphe's vision of the early 1960s is extremely selective, focusing on drunken hijinks and transgressive sluttiness and blinkering out the broken marriages, lost jobs and (for the transgressive sluts at least) social ostracism and gray-market abortions.
Also, the STDs! (Or VD, as Roger called it last week.)
Also, RACISM
this is a reply to ehcotton's first comment: do
you remember that scene in 'Out of Sight,' when George Clooney is being interviewed for the security guard job? The one set up for him by his old prison mate – Albert Brooks? The guy interviewing him – with his yogurt and his power bar?
I guess I could have said 'Its all yogurt and power bars now' and saved us a lot of time.
Yet there's something of self-improvement in her desire for self-destruction, as if our sin today is failing to enjoy ourselves properly. Rather than choosing depravity or asceticism, why not wallow in the depravity of asceticism: the obscene self-flaggelation of yoga, working on your relationship, eating organic bean sprouts, etc.
<3
I guess William Burroughs, Jr. would be a good person to ask about the "messy" life, right?
http://joeb-tallyho.blogspot.com/2010/04/william-burroughsjr.html
Oh wait, he's dead….
The only reason it looks so "alluring" on tv is that it is being play-acted by beautiful actors who are costumed by professionals. I don't know if anyone else has been lucky enough to be in the vicinity of any kind of internet/affiliate marketing convention (thanks, day job!), but trust me: there is plenty of debauchery and irresponsible behavior that still happens in the (lower echelons of) the corporate world, and IT IS NOT PRETTY OR ALLURING or anything of the sort when normal-looking people do it.
Ditto for annual sales conventions/meetings.
Dude … the stories I could tell you about the HR lady in your office. Homegirl's a freak.
And probably drunk.
I have a hard time figuring out how anyone thinks that the people in Mad Men are having fun or enviable lives! Are they watching with the sound off? Do they fast forward past any scene that doesn't take place at a party?
One of the things that got me to start watching is how the show is very clearly pointing out that the most "modern", egalitarian marriage is also by FAR the happiest – Pete and Trudy. There are alternatives presented, in the show, and they are still better than the "traditional Mad Men Marriage"!
She sounds like an art director I used to work for who was always bemoaning the loss of the boozy offices of the past and the outsize "characters" that worked in them. On the plus side it did mean that we had a drinks cabinet in the art department and I must admit I did enjoy the fist fight that an intern got into at an office Xmas party one year.
My [female] boss rode a mechanical bull in a skirt and flashed her underwear to the entire NY office of the company, and a [married] partner later passed out face down in the middle of the street outside the afterparty bar for the 2nd year running, and then demanded to go home with my [female] coworker who pulled him off the pavement because "he'd always thought she was pretty." (Don't worry guys! She put him in a cab and sent him away!)
My brother-in-law and his roommates are both in their mid-30s and both do lighting/grip work for film and TV and NYC; last time I saw them, they told us that, according to their older coworkers, back in the '80s when a shoot was going into overtime the people running the show would bring out the cocaine along with the craft service. "They were really productive," said the roommate, "but there were a lot more fistfights."
At a studio I worked in back in the 80s the boss used to get envelopes of cocaine delivered by bike messenger. We did lines on the lightbox.
Ecstasy and cocaine also passed freely through dotcom startup offices in the late 90s – early 00s…this is what happens in business when times are good!
I'm not sure who her "sources" hung around with, but from what I've been told, these "colorful" people she's referring to were actually called "drunks" just as frequently as anything else. And drunks certainly weren't any more fabulous in the 1960s than they are today. A drunk is still a drunk is still a drunk.
But then again, if I've gotten this right, this woman is bummed out the sexual harassment is now both uncouth and illegal, so I should probably just realize that trying to make sense of her argument is, in the words of Barney Frank, "like trying to have a conversation with my dining room table."
Wasn't there a post here about the appeal of a thoroughly pickled Hemingway.
Maybe, but I hardly think that anyone would argue (then or now) that Hemingway was just "colorful."
" But I don't find Don Draper's behavior reprehensible because it violates some abstract, obsolete code set down by Cotton Mather on Plymouth Rock. I hate it because it hurts people for no good reason. "
Cotton would probably come back at you that you've substituted situational ethics for morality.
One could say that history's winners are the people whose definition of "good reason" has prevailed.
Is it just me or is it getting kind of Rorty in here.
Seconded!
Well, and also, it's funny that she says without qualification that "the nation is once again transfixed by Mad Men" and that the show has enjoyed "phenomenal success" when in reality NO ONE WATCHES IT. The fourth season premiere got about half as many viewers as a mid-season episode of Burn Notice.
By the way, it's easy to drink on the job when you only have to compete with non-ethnic white males to keep that position. Accomplishments executed against only a sliver of the talent pool are far less impressive than those that require navigating the present-day meritocracy, however imperfect it is. Babe Ruth, that goes for you and your segregated American League, too.
Photo of Lock in a hot tub on the roof of Thor, anyone?
He really is the LeBron of the internet, isn't he?
I'm going to table that judgment until I see his "How to Dougie" video.
I can't help but read Roiphe's piece as sublimated self-loathing over her replacing the late, great Ellen Willis at NYU.
Maybe some of us love Mad Men because we fantasize about the days where men (real men, not the hipster kind) wore hats. The fantasy is kept in check by my anxiety over the fact that none of them wore seatbelts, but still.
Unless I missed something, Roiphe's piece seems to allude mainly to scenes in the first few episodes of Season 1. I'm guessing that's all she watched.
I just hope this doesn't mean we have to "re-discover" Esquivel all over again.
Set and match.
AMEN
How is this post not simply an oldschool-Aughties fisking of a "lamestream"-media piece?
To paraphrase M. Python, where's the pleasure in that?
I'm drinking Scotch right now which is nostalgic, right? I'm not an alcoholic, I'm just celebrating Mad Men. Yeah that's it.(Drinks more Scotch.)
http://m.assetbar.com/achewood/uuafD5cJ1
alt text: Do you think it is rad, Katie Roiphe?
Fantastic. Peter, I am ordering your memoir IMMEDIATELY.
LOVED your memoir, Peter. Heartbreakingly good.
Roiphe has apparently never heard of this marvelous new way to get your rocks off *without* all the alcoholism and infidelity: it's called open relationships and consensual BDSM.
I typed this comment with my nose. Does this mean I am still fun?