Sex Offender Week: Feminism for Young Dudes
Â
Luckily, there are some great, easy ways to start! Is there a girl you know who regularly has consensual, healthy sex with other unattached and willing participants — with no "drama," nobody hurting anybody or "dicking anyone around"? Do you sometimes think of this girl as a "whore" or a "slut," even while thinking that the men she's sleeping with are just "getting lucky" and "hey, good for them"? You should really stop this. You should stop thinking it, and you should especially stop saying it to other people.
Â
In fact-and this is for the white boys in the audience, mostly, but I trust you'll all get the point-you should think about it in the same way you do "the n-word." Look at that! I can't even write it out, as I am theoretically talking about it! And this is a good thing. Mainly, what I am saying here, is that maybe one day, you will think of these words as the "w-word" and the "s-word" and you'll be uncomfortable ever using them at all. You've just got to work at it.
Â
Now look, I am not saying that it will be easy. And if you go down this road, you may in fact end up being something of a different bro than you were when you started. (This is actually kind of the point.) Another example, I recently tossed off a post on my idiot tumblr in which I originally linked "Ain't No Fun" and talked about my proclivity for performing the thing while drunk as a high schooler. And this caused me to listen to and start singing the thing again — maybe the smoothest and most deft Nate Dogg has ever sung! — and I actually got uncomfortable having it up on my personal internet web page. (I changed it to "Lodi Dodi," which is only marginally better, but sort of better).
Â
This must sound crazy to you, bro! You are thinking, No way! I am never gonna stop rocking forever! But I'm not saying that you have to forget all those lyrics, never play the song, never laugh at its over-the-top ridiculous. However. You may think twice and stop yourself before posting the thing on the public Internet, just out of decorum. And the thing is, if you put some work into it, you'll find that you don't want to. Which is actually kind of freeing, in its way.
Â
Okay, so now you and 18-year-old me are seeing eye-to-eye completely. Oh Christ, you're thinking, this kid cannot be for real. He is obviously just doing this to pick up some chicks! And I would say to you, well. First I would say, No, I'm actually pretty well satisfied in that department of late, thank you. But mainly I would say, Really man, I would genuinely like to live in a world where the lady I am dating and my friends and my sister (oh that's right, I know you don't want to think about it, and it may in fact fill you with rage and make you want to "kick the ass of" the poor dude she is seeing who is probably a total sweetheart just trying to do right by her, but your sister is having sex. Sorry, dude!) can have and talk about having healthy, adult, consensual sex and feel good about it. And not fear they're gonna be called a "slut" or a "whore" for feeling and acting upon the feelings that the vast majority of the populace, no matter the orientation, just has.
Â
What I would like is for you to stop thinking about women with an 18th-century disposition while you chill on your iPad in the future.
Â
Okay, since the things I write here are usually about music, I would like to leave you with some music. One of the things that's great about trying to become a dude who digs chicks but also has at least an appreciation for and tries to stand in solidarity with the feminist struggle is it opens you to some great music. Don't worry! I'm not gonna make you listen to Bikini Kill. (Although, you probably just should.) But one artist that has always been a great help to me in dealing with these issues, in just trying to see things from the other perspective, is Liz Phair. You should listen to her unimpeachable first three albums ("studio LPs," shut up nerd) if you would like an intelligent, witty, honest but not always brutal, mainly just painfully, beautifully human elucidation of some of the issues you will be dealing with.
Â
You should also try and maybe crib a couple bromodels. Remember how the Beastie Boys started out talking about whiffleball bats and such? Funny, right? You have shotgunned a beer or two to these tracks, you certainly have! And you may have thought when they reversed this, started denouncing the misogyny and homophobia and idiot cartoonish racist violence-play of License to Ill and Paul's Boutique, you may have thought, Man. What a bunch of sell-outs, man! But I would ask you to listen to "Sure Shot" and really listen to Adam Yauch's verse about the mothers and the sisters and the wives and friends. Because it might sound maudlin or stupid now, there may be a time where you'd like to offer your love and respect to the end too. It will be long overdue!
Â
Also, this one dude who was like the lord god bro amongst bros at one point, waaaaay before any of our times, put it pretty succinctly too. After he married a strong, brilliant woman but a bit before he got pilloried for it until some other dude totally shot him.
Â
Matt Ealer thinks you look just fine in that jean jacket.
Pages: 1 2







Wait. Since when was "smashing the superstructure of male, white, corporate oppression" off the agenda?
I am just trying not to scare the other boys away, there. Because they get SCARED.
$5 says at least one person thought exactly that and still read the article. $5 more says I can even provide their name
Unfortunate acronym.
Dude, you want to sling some rationality to people who play hacky sack?
"Matt Ealer thinks you look just fine in that jean jacket." Matt's in the market for an older woman?
Oh no, oh no.
Fuck me, this is terrific.
2nd both parts of that statement.
Just the second part for me, thanks. Headache.
Enough with the Liz Phair already! We get it!
Also, "Ain't No Fun" is never wrong. Ever.
NOBODY GETS IT ENOUGH.
Agreed! Liz Phair has become the ultimate chill-bros-showing-I'm-into-lady-issues music. It's like having a ponytail in the 90s or being Eric Stoltz or something.
Wait, what? The Awl is a hipster handbook? I thought this was a website for cooking/gardening tips.
I only refrain from rape ironically.
The other side of this is that the total acceptance of the hookup culture as a "normal" model for male-female relationships has led to a commodification of sex. It is possible to suggest, without being sexist or calling anyone a "slut", that people, of any gender, who have casual sex with lots of different partners are perhaps missing out on some important aspect of human relationships, that it might not be entirely healthy to completely detach sex from love. In other words, sure, I get what you're saying about trying to apply the same standards to both men and women, but is it okay if the standards I apply (equally) are different from "whatever consensual thing adults do is totally fine"? Because I think sometimes adults consent to situations that are self-destructive.
Whatevs, nerd.
> are perhaps missing out
And the other side of this other side is that we are decades downstream of this change, maybe a few years from being two generations into it? so the psychic glory and agita of it all is playing out in precisely the issues this post is responding to…
Cf. the 1970's. Post-pill and pre-AIDS, the whole issue was pretty chill. So I'm told.
Considering that our entire popular culture presents monogamy as boring/soul-deadening/lethal, you can make this argument if you want, but who will listen?
Second that… shouldn't men stop behaving like sluts instead of women imitating men behaving like sluts?
…of course, I say that now that I have two girls… wasn't an issue for me when I was single…
Oh, that bio is going to get you some POINTS.
"What I would like is for you to stop thinking about women with an 18th-century disposition while you chill on your iPad in the future."
I honestly couldn't make it through this piece. It should have just been a Twitter entry.
It would have been a -very- good Twitter entry, though!
Elegance is learned, mah friends.
Jimmy Eat World made Matt Ealer the man he is today.
(also, A+.)
Jimmy Eat World and Kaoru Abe.
Matt Ealer is a beautiful dying animal.
How about if we're all more careful about how we treat each other and ourselves?
God, I miss NewToJezebel.
Whenever anyone chooses smiles over snark, NTJ is there. (So she's not here, but I'm sure she's somewhere. Somewhere with lots of kitten posters and dust ruffles.)
She is Balk, you know…
http://gawker.com/5021018/stop-talking-about-the-crazy-person
Man, I'm all over that post and I don't remember it one bit. I thought the Alzheimer's would be more gradual-like … rats.
Loved that it was via fax.
And I thought you were gonna say that because of the feminists, it's easier to get laid. (But not for me, I'm old.)
And married…
Right, SA, mostly the latter.
Otherwise, I'd be SUCH a SLUT.
William Vollman is using computer technology a la Spielberg to replace a bunch of stuff in his books right now. Yet I can't shake the feeling that "Walkie-Talkies for Gloria" lacks something.
That article made my nipples sore.
Wow, that comment made me hot and bothered.
If you want a word to have no meaning, give it none. NWA took back Nigga, there are movements within the gay community to take back Fag and Dyke. Why do women get hurt when called a whore, slut, or even *gaps* the C-word!! Besides, girls call each other sluts far more than guys do. The whole queen bee aspect and such.
Movements to take back fag & Dyke? Dude, we never left those words. I'm going to call up Dykes on Bikes to smack the silly out of you.
"If you want a word to have no meaning, give it none. NWA took back Nigga…"
Wow, no. Just no. Also, girls calling each other bad words basically supports Matt's point. In most cases, we haven't changed the meaning because it's not that easy & not up to just us?
"Also, girls calling each other bad words basically supports Matt's point." Kinda not, actually!
Well, sort of. These name-calling women are still buying into the double-standard for men and women and the number of sexual-partnershipping going on. In either case, the name-callers want to deflect attention away from their own behaviour, gain a perceived moral advantage, or take advantage of the aforementioned double-standard.
Wait, I thought slut was a good thing?
Apparently we're not the nineties yet, and "sex-positive" isn't part of the discussion.
I need a hand here. After reading this article several times in a row – at least twice out loud – I'm still not sure I understand it.
Seems like the gist of it is that men shouldn't call women sluts or whores or any other derogatory term simply because they like to fuck, yes? And that by taking the high road, we'll all get laid more and better?
If so, I agree. But for fuck's sake, why couldn't this vital message be written in English?
PS – If you're going to do a week about gender issues, how about doing a bit encouraging ladies out there to sleep with men, the kinds who eat meat, drink scotch, fix shit with their hands, have body hair, don't discuss their emotions, etc? After all, most men will make themselves into what women respond to. Hence, a city full of passive aggressive, feminized, emotionally indulgent half-men who appear "safe" on the outside but inside are manipulative and selfish.
Pro tip: Women like men who do whatever the hell they want and don't worry about whether or not it's "feminizing".
Maybe for a fee you can sponsor a post in which women are directed to sleep with you specifically? Like those Equinox posts…
re: Mr Babbage: this is an old one, but have you read it? http://www.blacktable.com/elder040212.htm
Ooh, yo
*cough* You are going to enjoy Wednesday's entry, was what I was trying to say.
PC Thuggery. Which is fine by me. The way I reckon it the quality-of-life value of the disrespect for the perp is far-outweighed by the quality-of-life value of the respect for the victim. That is, Bros, you are being asked to give up something that gives you a little bit of pleasure. But in doing so you will be giving much greater pleasure to someone else. Like a blowjob.
Does the author think that his hypothetical Natty Lite-swilling, hacky sack-playing, women-oppressing "bro" reads The Awl? Or is his intended audience a notional reader who already agrees with his vague but snotty ad-hominem broadside, and can actually get off feeling superior to an impossibly overdetermined (and somewhat dated) straw man? Just asking.
also wondering this.
Straw man? Plenty of straight male, fine beer-swilling Awl readers regularly engage in casual misogyny. And plenty get off primarily to the degradation of women. (With caveats about how the latter is not always a terrible thing, but worthy of consideration.)
And plenty play the part of dudes, even if self-consciously and somewhat ironically.
+1. Some of us are guys who understand the above, do our best to live it, and come here for bear videos, not to be smugly condescended to.
Agree. Just because you're into vintage clothing doesn't mean you can't be into casual disregard of women.
Men had to get married to get laid before feminism and the sexual revolution, right? Or go to pros. What did people DO?
Basically? Your grandmother was a slut, but no one ever talked about it or admitted it, even unto today, so everyone pretends no one ever had premarital sex before 1969.
a. People got engaged, then had sex.
b. People had sex, then pretended they were still virgins.
My grandmother was a late in life slut. Much like those woman who decide they are lesbians after they have kids and their husbands die, she went for it after she got divorced and the kids were at college. But this was still the 70s. I've read the Kinsey Report so I know people DID IT. But aren't we happier now that we can be open about it and not just admit it secretly to pervy sex researchers?
For what it is worth, I really appreciated this article. It was well put together and well thought out. I have nothing but respect for who wrote it.
huh. i guess some people think slutty girls are bad? i always liked over-sexed girls.
Please engage in pleasurable, consensual, non-committal sex with me immediately, Matt Ealer.
That will not be possible.
"Who am I to sit up on my high horse and create this guy just to harsh on him so?"
Yeah… bro… who are you?
I can barley read through that gimmicky-ass, passive-aggressive affectation you're writing through.
I agree with what you're saying, but how you've chosen to say it is fucking lame.
Say hello to your Mother for me,
ross
Matt Eales, did you go to UD? I went to high school in Wilmington. Tell me about emo experiences in Newark plz.
Ealer*. FML.
This is great. I have been thinking this way for a while as of late. You should not be called names just because you like to have sex :P (for my fb friends this is an article about not using words like slut)
Cool story, bro.
This article is atrocious.
I like it – then again, I'm pretty sick of being called a slut and a whore. Should I add in some filthies and some dirties in there?
Maybe that'll cause enough of an imbalance of blood in your bodies that it will knock some of you off the pedestals on which you've put yourself and your 'post-sexist' views.
I didn't mean to post that twice, nor sound as mean as I did. Oh well, it is just the internet anyway.
I like it – then again, I'm pretty sick of being called a slut and a whore. Should I add in some filthies and some dirties in there too?
Maybe that'll cause enough of an imbalance of blood in your bodies that it will knock some of you off the pedestals on which you've put yourself and your 'post-sexist' views.
i think i'm in love with you.