Thursday, March 21st, 2013
5

What's The Rush?

I tend to vacillate between a) pretending that nothing really matters because our existence, no matter how highly evolved we like to tell ourselves we are, is essentially a meaningless and arbitrary journey through a course fraught with obstacles both external and self-made in which we think we are choosing our own direction when in reality we are being pushed along by a collection of chemicals whose only goal is to spread their own ingredients regardless of the damage it does to their current host and b) cowering in the corner when confronted by the certainty that there's no actual need to pretend, because it's all true. In those bleak moments of awareness the most frightening thing to consider, apart from the almost unbearable solitude that no amount of excess can ever fully alleviate, is not that the future will bring with it some kind of chaotic change but that it will essentially be pretty much the same as it is now, except more humid. This is the best it's going to be, and that's way worse than what you thought was intolerable even a year ago. It doesn't much help to learn that the universe is even older than previously projected, and expanding more slowly than earlier estimates had assumed. So it looks like we're going to be here for a while. Nobody will blame you if you decide that you might as well take another shot at getting through 'Infinite Jest' or 'House of Cards.'

Tags:

5 Comments / Post A Comment

Annie K. (#3,563)

Let me just fill you in at what they're hinting about but not telling you, so you know what you're really up against: the universe is hotter on one side than on the other, it's not doing what it's supposed to on the largest scales, and it has a giant cold spot. In short, it's not perfect. And the whole of universe-ology is based on it being perfect. We've been lied to.

Annie K. (#3,563)

@Annie K. I forgot to add: that hotter-on-one-side part is called the Axis of Evil. For real.

Niko Bellic (#1,312)

@Annie K. "And the whole of universe-ology is based on it being perfect"

Well, this is simply not true. If universe was perfect, exactly nothing would have happened after The Big Bang. All the particles would have dispersed in the most orderly fashion and stayed equally distant from each other forever (and so, no stars or planets would ever have formed). Everything we have in the universe today is the result of it's imperfections. That has been known for quite a while, and universe-ology has never been based on the assumption that universe is perfect.

Annie K. (#3,563)

@Niko Bellic Well ok, you're exactly right. It's hard fitting nuances into a comment section. Not that we're nuances. But on the large scale, it's supposed to be isotropic and homogeneous and obey the laws of physics, and in that sense, perfect.

Niko Bellic (#1,312)

no matter how highly evolved we like to tell ourselves we are…in reality we are being pushed along by a collection of chemicals

We may think what we hear is music, when in "reality" (you know, that thing that can be objectively registered only by machinery) it's just vibrations of air.

Post a Comment