This Weekend in London
After Mark Duggan was shot by police in North London, in Tottenham, four days ago, the family conducted a peaceful vigil and march to the police station (as one does in black communities around the world; standard practice in Oakland, East New York, etc.). There were discrepancies in the account of Duggan's death, as usual. (Police said he'd shot an officer; instead, as usual, an officer apparently shot an officer.) Family and friends waited outside the police station for hours and were ignored. Later that night, a different kind of demonstration emerged, and 26 police were injured in what ensued. Over the weekend, riots and mini-riots "broke out" from Tottenham to Brixton all the way down to Oxford Circus. "Most of the looters were young teenagers, many of them girls," says the Telegraph—interesting: how many looters were there? How many of them were girls?—and here it's helpful to note that Tottenham has the highest unemployment rate in London. Local businesses were trashed; in pictures, demonstrators seem nearly all young and of all races. Like many episodes of unrest, this is a fairly inarticulate class uprising, with a few goons and a lot of people without jobs who are pissed off about the police shooting people. And the further you get from London, it seems, the more the riots are treated as some act of chav hooliganry; it's paragraph 13 in the Times where Tottenham is described as a place where "a large Afro-Caribbean population has felt singled out by the police for abuse"—and Mark Duggan's name doesn't make an appearance until paragraph 15. Unfortunately, we don't get many good accounts of what's really happening, or why people are furious enough to put themselves in harm's way, at least in part because most members of the media didn't feel safe reporting from the area, and as well a few were attacked. (Photo by Tom Kay.)









I have a hard time engaging with this. #riotweary
Makes me wistful for the days when the coppers could only kill someone by hitting them over the head with a truncheon instead of shooting them.
One doesn't necessarily need to be "furious" to start looting, cf. any recent post-victory sports riot.
@TheRtHonPM : Furiously happy.
I am very confused by the Twitter coverage of all that looting which is simultaneously (1) non-existent, because people don't actually loot, and (2) a legitimate if inarticulate expression of class grievances.
Here is an extract from a hurriedly written but long and fascinating blog post by a London cop who is apparently even more confused than I am:
Walking down Tottenham High Road during Sunday day time in plain clothes with a colleague the damage is shocking to see, everything has been targeted, the community has been smashed and it looks like there has been a rampage by a herd of elephants, street furnature is squashed flat in places, shops have had their windows broken and then been looted, we deftly avoid what looks like a pool of blood and make our way further down. There are members of the media hunting in packs, looking to zoom in on anybody who has been separated from the herd, I see a man come out of his shop and sit with his head in his hands on the pavement, his crying is audible from 80 or so yards, within seconds he is surrounded by people with cameras, I can no longer hear him crying, all I can hear is the whir of camera motors as his heartbreaking moment is captured on dozens of memory cards, I want to move them away, I want to shield this poor man from these vultures, I can’t…
Ugh. Apparently more unrest expected tonight. Lots of shops/train stations are closed around the city. The Guardian is reporting that stuff's already happening in Hackney (north-east of the city centre, where all the hipsters are but also still some poor people).
http://pennyred.blogspot.com/
thoughtful account from an orwell prize shortlisted blogger
@dingus
If reflexive defense of thugs on political grounds is thoughtful, then yes, very much so.