The Attack on the Memoir: Not Interested, Says Tobias Wolff!
In the most-recent New York Times Book Review came an attack on the memoir. Well, technically it was an attack on the memoir written by anyone outside the circle of the “memoir-eligible.” It goes: "There was a time when you had to earn the right to draft a memoir," and then proceeds to savage three recent memoirs. The author, Neil Genzlinger, yearned for a now-distant day, when “unremarkable lives went unremarked upon, the way God intended."
“Who does he think he is?” said Natalie Goldberg, memoirist and author of the Writing Down the Bones and the recent Old Friend from Far Away: The Practice of Writing Memoir, calling Genzlinger's view “small-minded.”
“He should catch up with the times," she said. "People are writing blogs now. Writing is alive now. Writing is not for a special few, and that’s wonderful. Writing is a basic human right, just like the pursuit of happiness, justice, and equality.”
Anne Fadiman, a Yale professor whose creative nonfiction has won the National Book Critics Circle Award, wrote in an e-mail that while she agrees that plenty of bad memoirs are being written, she doesn’t agree that “one need have led an unusually interesting life, though it helps.”
“What matters most,” she wrote, “is that one is an interesting writer and an interesting person. Have you read Virginia Woolf’s short personal essay ‘The Death of the Moth?’ The action takes place over the course of five or ten minutes. Here’s the plot: Woolf notices a moth in her study. It flies around a little and then dies. End of story. Where's the action? Where's the drama? Inside Woolf's head, of course. She makes us interested in this apparent non-event because of what she brings to the table. The same goes for book-length memoirs.”
We also wrote to Tobias Wolff, who’s won the PEN/Faulkner Award, for his take on the matter.
“Sorry, but I haven’t the interest or time for this,” he wrote.
James McAuley is a student in Cambridge, Mass.






So, ranting about this has def. cost me some tumblr followers in the past few days, but I feel the same way about this whole attack on the memoir as I do about The Daily, or Gawker redesigns, or NY Times paywalls, et fucking cetera.
I like reading. Stuff that is good is preferable to stuff that is not. Just make it easier (not necesarily free, make it really good and really easy [like a good easy to find book reccomended by people i trust] and I'll pay) for me to get, and I would be happy.
It's a bunch of fucking words thrown the fuck together, more talentedly by some people and less talentedly by others. Let people fucking write, and we can judge finished works on a piece by piece basis. If something sucks, or just isn't your cup of tea, stop reading it. It's no big fucking deal.
Neil Genzlinger also included those people who can write about the most mundane things and make them interesting as being in the memoir worthy catagory. So let's not get our knickers in a twist, kay?
Memoirs are stupid and written most frequently by people who drastically overestimate the worth of their own experience. The fact that other stupid people buy and read them explains the continued publication. Every mommy-memoir or weak-ass drug story takes valuable shelf space that might otherwise go to literature of some sort.
The art of literature is the distillation of the universal from the idiosyncratic. Memoir aims to distill the idiosyncratic from the universal; it never works.
I am really impressed by people who can make such broad generalizations. I get so bogged down by individual details, myself!!
This would be funny if your snide comment was deliberately indirect and general.
"
MemoirsThings I don't like are stupid."Fixed.
The same argument could be made substituting "memoir" for "having an opinion." Ex: there was a time when you have to earn the right to express your opinions. Now, we are all subject to the tyranny of every bloviator to comment on a blog! Every ill-formed comment takes up valuable space that could otherwise be going to the considered opinions of the qualified, etc.
There is no shortage of shelf space. People read what they are interested in.
You know what the real problem is? The real problem isn't who-gets-to-tell-their-story, the real problem is that a third of the audience wants somebody to say "Goddammit" for them, a third wants somebody to signal status and superiority for them, a third wants somebody to say "OMG" for them, and the other half can't add.
This is the most subtle parody of The Daily I've seen so far.
We contacted Raymond Carver for his thoughts as to when a memoirist has "earned" his or her right to publish.
"I'm afraid I don't have much of an opinion on that," Lish replied.