Monday, September 13th, 2010
3

How the 'WSJ' Took a Pro-Corporate Stand on the Nastiest Trademark Battle Ever

ughThis is a brutal attack on the WSJ magazine-over something as seemingly simple as a profile of the fashion importer of Ugg boots. In the piece, the magazine goes "to great lengths to be as friendly as possible to Deckers"-Deckers being the company that shut down every company in Australia that also (and already) made ugg boots, a form of footwear that has existed for ages. Deckers registered the trademark in more than 100 countries and promptly began making their uggs in China. And now the WSJ is here to help you not be taken in by "counterfeit" uggs-so you can only purchase shoes made by the litigation-friendly behemoth.

3 Comments / Post A Comment

keisertroll (#1,117)

Ugg Fugly.

KarenUhOh (#19)

Deckers are Dockers for people who don't earn enough yet to be dorks.

keisertroll (#1,117)

And Australia is quite sue-y when it comes to copyright. Just ask the copyright troll who bought the rights to the Kookaburra song and fucked over Men At Work.

Post a Comment