Friday, June 11th, 2010
20

Vladimir Arnold and Our Decline Into Innumerate Savagery

V. ARNOLDIf there's one thing you should read by Vladimir Arnold-who died last week at the age of 72, and who is memorialized by the Times today as "a founder of singularity theory, or, as it is sometimes more ominously called, catastrophe theory"-it's his January, 1998 article "Innumeracy and the Fires of the Inquisition." While Arnold's work was what we laypeople would regard as a completely incomprehensible math, he was cognizant of the problems of the gulf between the state of written and taught mathematics and the ability of common people to understand it-and also extremely observant regarding politics, particularly sensitive to the presence and history of antisemitism, and greatly interested in the drift of Russia as a state concerned with an intellectual populace.

Here are some bits of that piece (available as a cached pdf here), which was, really, quite vicious (and came at a fascinating time):

We live in an insane world, in which most governments behave like the pigs under an oak tree in the fable by Krylov, both eating the acorns and digging up its roots, thus destroying the source of their very sustenance.

With the (temporary?) cessation of military confrontation between east and West, the funding of science in Russia has been virtually discontinued. Experts say that during the last 10 years it has decreased seventeen-fold and stands now at one-fourth of the level required for its mere survival. The spending on education decreased from 7% of the GDP in 1970 to 0.6% in 1997 (with further reductions planned for 1998).

[...]

It is somehow ridiculous to have to prove that every civilized person needs to be numerate: only savages think that bread comes down from the sky, that cars have always existed, and that there are no benefits from having airplanes.

Even more important than the ability to add fractions is the fact that a basic acquaintance with mathematics allows one to distinguish a correct argument from a faulty one. Without this ability, a society turns into a herd, easily manipulated by demagogues. According to Western experts, in the current situation in Russia, the assumption of power by a Hitler is even more likely than it was in Germany in the 1920s.

[...]

Whether our next ruler will be the Mafia or a charismatic nationalistic extremist (as is predicted by the head of the Department of Political Science of the MSU, who also calls for a struggle against the US, a struggle which "will require great courage and the ability to take risks", and which will most
likely be of a "military-strategic" nature (Vestnik RAN, 1997, p. 1017)), the basics of fractions and percentages are absolutely essential in modern society. The future of a Russia in which the study of fractions is replaced by macrame appears bleak.

MACRAME, PEOPLE.

Let us leave you with a bit in which he took a look at the applications of real-world mathematics. That a complex mathematical thinker was also such a concrete thinker on politics and the applications of science is highly unusual.

All mathematics is divided into three parts: cryptography (paid for by CIA, KGB and the like), hydrodynamics (supported by manufacturers of atomic submarines) and celestial mechanics (financed by military and by other institutions dealing with missiles, such as NASA.).

20 Comments / Post A Comment

lbf (#2,343)

But! when people aren't numerate and can't understand science, they make such great art!

Wrapitup (#975)

Or they join the Tea Party.

Art Yucko (#1,321)

Whatever, Sadimir, I've always thought of well-crafted hanging planters as the hallmark of an advanced civilization!

deepomega (#1,720)

"charismatic nationalistic extremist"

cough cough cough cough.

Miles Klee (#3,657)

in post-cold war russia, chilling future accurately predicts you!

jfruh (#713)

Wait, is Putin "charismatic"? I think of him more as a terrifying soulless lizard-man, but I guess certain types of charisma are culturally contingent?

deepomega (#1,720)

He's charismatic in the same way Hitler was. It's completely not understandable to anyone outside of Russia, but he's super popular there even as his policies pissed people off.

lawyergay (#220)

Choire: I love it when you work bluestocking.

Annie K. (#3,563)

But about the funding for those three parts of math, he's dead right.

ProfessorBen (#1,254)

I only counted too.

Jim Demintia (#1,815)

Is it just me, or could you substitute the U.S. for Russia, adjust some of the figures to reflect our own policy drive for privatization and budget slashing in education, and have this whole diatribe work more or less just as accurately?

saythatscool (#101)

Celestial mechanics' eyes are much closer to electronic components so I think they have the leg up there without any military help.

Annie K. (#3,563)

Oh ha ha.

SidAndFinancy (#4,328)

Math is hard, so I went to law school. Problem solved!

In my travels, I've learned that "You have to understand, I'm not an accountant" is the layman's phrase for "Please be patient. I am an idiot."

iplaudius (#1,066)

Do the three parts of mathematics he describes correspond to the tripartite division of algebra, analysis, and topology? I ask, because at least a few prominent graduate programs in mathematics divide the doctoral qualifying examination into those three areas.

riotnrrd (#840)

I think they correspond to the tripartite division of Gaul. But you have to understand, I'm not an accountant.

Wrapitup (#975)

I disagree with the assumption in his analysis that the teaching of percentages and fractions (well, percentages are fractions anyway) is imperiled. As long as commerce exists, basic arithmetic and fractions will be taught everywhere in the world. These don't contradict religious dogma the way evolution does, or make things inconvenient for major corporate players the way climate change science does. Nor are they complex concepts that make people feel emotionally overwhelmed like what happens often with calculus.
I see a bright future for fractions. And a terrible one for physics, higher math, chemistry and palaeontology. There are plenty of pre-med students and women with low self esteem and high self doubt, who want to study physics but settle for biology, in the United States to keep biology safe. For now.

MollyculeTheory (#4,519)

Ha. Woman who liked physics, took about 4 minutes of Diff EQ, ended up with a PhD in molecular biology, *sheepishly raising hand*.

Mr. Arnold, Daina Taimina would like to have a word with you regarding the practical application of feminine handicrafts to mathematics. Right this way.

Post a Comment