The NYT's Motoko Rich does some e-book accounting and finds that e-books may make money for publishers, but not enough! Per copy, they will make "$4.56 to $5.54, before paying overhead costs or writing off unearned advances." But they are also afraid that e-books will erode the audience for paperbacks, and so publishers are freaking out, but quietly, because it doesn't seem like she could actually find any to quote on the record. (Instead she gets a guy who's a "consultant to publishers," who thinks publishers should "slow down the movement to e-books," and Lindy Hess, the head of the Columbia Publishing Course, who would of course like to see as many jobs in the industry maintained so that her program may continue to invite Sonny Mehta to speak.) But Anne Rice, of all people, has the most sensible take.
Writes Rich:
"None of us know what books cost. None of us know what kind of profits hardcover or paperback publishers make," said Anne Rice, the author of "Interview With a Vampire" and the "Songs of the Seraphim" series.She said she did not know whether publishers had struck the right price for e-books. "For all I know, a million books at $9.99 might be great for an author," Ms. Rice said. "The only thing I think is a mistake is people trying to hold back e-books or Kindle and trying to head off this revolution by building a dam. It's not going to work."

What's with all the Jesus in that pic?
She gave up vampires, is what.
Honest question: is there a flood coming, for la e-book phenomenon? Because I look around me, on trains, buses, park benches, beaches, the windows I peer in at night, and those folks who aren't staring at their phones or computer monitors or just drooling on themselves are holding real live paper books.
Is this a real tsunami, or a just a ripple that you waste your Saturday afternoon waiting to shrug over?
Exactly.
Agreed. I saw an uptick in e-readers on my daily commute right after the holidays, and a month later they had disappeared as people reverted to books, print-outs, and yes, even newspapers. Maybe something will tip the balance in the future, but my suspicion is that this latest batch of e-readers is gathering dust on people's nightstands.
So like, in the online Vampire community, people are maddies with Rice because she gets mad about fans using her characters for slash? 2.0 problems, yall!
i always blamed her lawyer's cease-and-desist letters for making the stans calling 'speculative fiction' instead of slash/fan fiction.
case in pt: http://www.angelfire.com/va/eternalfire/Specs.html
(damn, now i'm all nostalgic for tiled backgrounds and author disclaimers...!)
Angelfire is my nickname!
whaaaaa! i'm geocities sunset strip. wanna be my beta reader?
Needs an animated gif somewhere
The new pricing system is not an "experiment" but rather Apple trying to lure publishers away from the Kindle to the iPad by promising to use agency system pricing and taking that small cut for themselves. While it's essential for publishers to be able to set their own prices for eBooks, how long will Apple go with the flow in a system that's the opposite of how they price songs on iTunes?
Personally, I find $10-15 for an electronic copy of a book for which I normally pay less than $10 to be wildly overpriced. Also, I find electronic copies of books to be inferior to print versions.
As a comparison, a real life CD is about $13. An mp3 album is about $6-7, and I would even go so far as to say that a digital copy of music is VASTLY preferable to a hard copy that I must rip myself.
Modern Library is the new vinyl.
But where will the digital version be in 20 years? I still have records I bought when I was a teenager (and one day I'll give them to my kids) but are you going to get out your battered old iPod (which will no longer work) and get all sentimental about the files on it?
oh, word.
Damn, I was looking forward to another insane rambling monologue from her, like her notorious Amazon freak out of 2004 :(
Guess you'll just have to read the book!