Monday, December 7th, 2009

January's 'Vanity Fair' Slightly Larger Than 'Harper's' and About Half the Size of December's 'GQ'

Oh dear.
Huh! [Related]

8 Comments / Post A Comment

mordzook (#2,330)

Hasn't GQ always been something of a size queen? I hope I'm using the expression correctly.

edp (#935)

The preferred usage would be to say that the GQ target reader has always been something of a size queen.

Apart from examples like drag, and certainly in the case of size, queen is almost always used in place of enthusiast, not purveyor.

Baboleen (#1,430)

How about the print size? I'm already using 200x readers! That's one way to diminish your readership.

So all the perfume samples are mashed together?

Spena (#640)

Well would you look at that sandwich of sin and salaciousness.

I'm blushing.

Mary HK Choi (#1,469)

HOLY FUCK. I wish GQ would stop pretending they care/know about "funny." They're shit at it. REALLY? Bradley Cooper? He should go fly a kite. A KITE! They're obvi all borgs over there…

HiredGoons (#603)

How Bazaar.

David (#192)

I was glad to see what looks like a fairly decent sized mineral sample of copper made it into the same picture as Harper's– there on a round wood table.

Post a Comment