
Oh my God, someone read the 2300-page financial regulatory bill, and provides some highlights! Which is good, because it passed the Senate, 60 to 38. (Yes, that's three Republicans, one Democrat naysayer, one non-voter and one dead Senator.) What's in it? I have made my peace with the fact that I will never know. Will you? Let me know!
This seems to me a strange account of what we saw yesterday at the Goldman Sachs hearings, particularly to run in the Times' Business section, the readers of which, presumably, have some familiarity with the fact that 1. yes, there were hearings and 2. they were weird hearings! And it seems so odd that they keep calling the testifying Goldman staff "officials," though I suppose it's technically accurate. (They are department heads in a corporation.) The Times wrote: "Steering away from financial jargon, the senators tried to put a human face on the questioning. Senator John Ensign, Republican of Nevada, declared that more transparency was needed 'so we don't [...]