Quantcast
 

On My Latest Obsession: Why You Should Give "Gilmore Girls" Another Chance

I agree with most of this (GG is one of my all-time faves), except:

1) Author's contention that, "In reality, sure, 'Dawson's Creek' was actually not that great (especially after its first season)..."

It was, actually, pretty great! Perhaps not for the entirety of all six seasons, but it was at least compellingly watchable for 4+, and not unwatchable for the remainder (the tension re: whether would choose Pacey or Dawson lasted till the very end.) Think about how quickly shows like "The O.C." and "Gossip Girl" devolve after just one ("The O.C.") or two ("Gossip Girl"--though I'm told it's better of late?) seasons. No small feat for the Capeside crew.

2. "...But it's not not on 'LOST's level either."

Ya lost me, bro.

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 3:06 pm 0

On Nuts, In Order

@neel WHERE WOULD YOU RANK DEEZ NUTS, BALK?

Posted on April 19, 2011 at 2:35 pm 3

On Nuts, In Order

Cashew in last place? ARE YOU NUTS?

Posted on April 19, 2011 at 2:35 pm 2

On How To Split A Check At A Restaurant

@resipaloquacious @choire sicha

Heh. BYGONE ERA, GUYS.

Posted on March 9, 2011 at 1:28 am 0

On How To Split A Check At A Restaurant

Sheesh. Thanks!

(Want to get dinner some time?)

Posted on March 8, 2011 at 1:13 pm 3

On How To Split A Check At A Restaurant

"Honestly, is there any sub-species of human more ill-behaved than a young attractive female?"

I actually stand by that part.

Posted on March 8, 2011 at 1:06 pm 3

On How To Split A Check At A Restaurant

Sorry! I was just speaking from personal experience! I have been out on many group dinners where the party who is short happens to be a young, attractive girl, and her response, in my personal and not universal experience, is generally the same. What do you want me to do?

I am 100% certain there are Young Attractive Men who pull this shit, too. I just probably don't dine with them that often.

Posted on March 8, 2011 at 12:54 pm 3

On The Gawker Commenter Day of Rage

Wait, question: if Choire is commenter #2, and Balk is #4, presumably Cho is #1. SO WHO IS #3?!?!?!

I won't be able to sleep until someone answers this for me.

Posted on February 11, 2011 at 3:32 pm 0

On We Need New Ways of Judging the Success of Websites

And how does The Awl size up re: this metric? No sarcasm, genuinely curious!

Posted on December 14, 2010 at 6:42 pm 0

On Los Angeles Awl Bawlers Will Be Awl Bawling At Tomorrow's Awl Bawl Tomorrow In Los Angeles

I hope for everyone's sake that that's not the surprise Balk is talking about.

Posted on August 10, 2010 at 12:05 am 0