Quantcast
 

On Three Gayest Sentences About A Gay Wedding Ever

@Murgatroid I MEAN... MAYBE SHE'S THE FOURTH GAYEST THING?

God I wish this slideshow was 400 pages long, kinda proud of them.

Posted on April 12, 2013 at 11:36 am 0

On I'm A Hot Guy Who Embodies Kraft Salad Dressing On Reality TV, Ask Me Anything

@Mr. B People care about where to drink in Brooklyn! (I mean, they should!)

Posted on April 3, 2013 at 12:48 pm 0

On The Love of My Twenties: An Unexpurgated, Factual Account

@sunnyciegos hahahaa!

Posted on March 25, 2013 at 3:33 pm 0

On The Five Worst Kinds of Co-Workers

@deepomega That's what I'd like to do here. Fortunately all our Jews and marrieds and gays and smokers are too lazy to leave their computers and stop working.

Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:15 pm 2

On We Should Have Killed These Internet Pioneers Back In the 1990s

@libmas We're just going to run this piece every day, but in reverse time, so it's published retroactively since day one.

Posted on March 15, 2013 at 1:57 pm 5

On You Won't Believe These Seven Amazing Papal Elections

@stuffisthings I really wanted to totally OMG SLIDESHOW this one, just to crack myself up further.

Posted on March 7, 2013 at 3:31 pm 0

On You Won't Believe These Seven Amazing Papal Elections

@ARS It totally worked. (We are LOLing.)

Posted on March 7, 2013 at 3:31 pm 1

On How Does "Fringe" End? (Or, *When* Does "Fringe" End?)

@joeclark We don't italicize the titles of TV shows. We italicize the titles of movies and books and publications. This is contradiction to the AP stylebook, which suggests one use quotation marks for "books, computer games, movies, operas, plays, poems, songs,television programs, lectures, speeches and works of art," but insists that one does not use quotes for publications.

They are also wrong.

Posted on January 18, 2013 at 1:05 pm 2

On Please Meet Michael Macher, Our Associate Publisher

@Astigmatism Ha, well, that's not a product that's native to us here. There's a different array of these things. You probably are much happier with editorial things, not advertorial--as am I--when a sponsor actually backs an editorial project. Here's to more of that! :)

Posted on November 30, 2012 at 12:05 pm 0

On Please Meet Michael Macher, Our Associate Publisher

@brad Haha! Ask a real question, get a real answer.

The truth is, there are ways to do this where it's win-win. Advertising underwriting--in the form of "presenting sponsorship"--in the 1940s and 1950s often worked spectacularly well; it can be done on the web as well.

Posted on November 30, 2012 at 12:04 pm 0