You have the wrong link here, but I was excited for a minute to think that the Wall Street Journal had published the phrase "wank fodder for beardy liberals."
Not sure where this optimism for December is coming from. I mean, did you see the thing with the snowy owls?
Pretty sure that every single person on earth who ever buys The Surprise Attack of Jabba the Puppett: An Origami Yoda Book will do it from this link.
Just switch to Feedly and hate your life a little bit more each day, like I did.
On Job Open
This is all well said except for the part about not liking getting drunk.
What I want to know is how much to tip a Nobel laureate.
This guy’s more out of it than I thought.
Do you pronounce it differently from "all"? Because I don't, and I feel silly when I tell people that I read something on "The All."
On White Conservatives On Supreme Court Wondering Whether We Need Laws That Allow Black People To Vote For Democrats
@barnhouse Imagine if when Obama was a senator, Rush Limbaugh or whoever had said "well we know Obama will vote for [liberal thing], because his white bosses will tell him what to do." Wouldn't you be troubled? Wouldn't you ask, "well, why is he singling out Obama as the one who will follow orders rather than having his own agency?" Wouldn't you ask "why does he think that the other senators, who have the same rank as him, are Obama's *bosses*?" Wouldn't you wonder why he's putting so much emphasis on those "bosses" being *white*?
Wouldn't the only possible conclusion be "because he is being racist"? Wouldn't you be unimpressed by defenses like "literary pov" and "enraged howl" and "it's excessive, and it's angry"?
Why isn't that the conclusion here?