I'm a software developer, biologist, and participant/observer of human evolution/devolution.
Hey, I quit Twitter before it was trendy!
I signed up in 2007, before anyone else I knew had even heard of it, and I soon concluded that all the hype was just hype. In the past seven years, I haven't seen any reason to revise that judgment.
Twitter has always struck me as absurdly optimistic about humanity. In particular, it's lunacy that, by default, anyone can @-mention anyone.
So yes, follow Ms. Teigen off Twitter, or if you insist on staying, block early and often!
@Mike Hatley@facebook: Speaking of being "woefully incorrect when it comes to facts", The Awl is not Gawker or otherwise a department of the Denton empire. Never has been. Most likely never will be.
Herrman, you're a more moderate moderator than I would be.
Two observations: (1) The word "Homeland" - note that the capital is mandatory - has long struck me and a good many other people as decidedly Orwellian, and not just because it was promulgated by the Dubya gang. To use it in the manner described here is, at best, stupendously tone-deaf. (2) All this has roughly the same relevance to reality as does astrology or numerology. It could, in fact, be considered a form of numerology.
I can hardly express how appalling it is that the president, who has rightly been hailed as an intellectual giant in comparison to his predecessor, nonetheless thinks Andrew Sullivan is smart.
All by itself, Sullivan's cheerleading of the Iraq war conclusively demonstrated otherwise. That is simply not a mistake smart people made.
I'm assuming, of course, that this characterization of the president's reading habits and his reasons for them isn't just B.S. But, of course, it might be.
"They seem *quite* excited. How do you feel?": Like I should stop reading The Awl right this instant and get back to work on the ad-, tracking-, and data-mining-free replacement for Facebook and Tumblr I'm developing. (No, I'm not joking. Yes, I realize that sounds absurd.) If Facebook keeps this up, which they undoubtedly will, the demand for my service is going to grow and grow and grow.
On Time Spent
I'm here to remind you - tediously, yet again, don't I have anything better to do? - that if you sold subscriptions, you could ignore all this nonsense, at least as regards The Awl.
This too shall pass. Remember when MySpace bestrode the world like a colossus?
The funny thing is, I remember how, in The Time Before Reagan, many conservatives (radicals, really, but I'll retain the conventional terminology) felt like nobody represented them. I grew up among people whose politics were Birch-ish at a time when the Republican party was led by people like Gerald Ford. As far as they were concerned, no national politician spoke for them. Reagan was a big deal, because he at least kinda-sorta agreed with them. Still, most Republican politicians sadly failed to be True Conservatives, and even now, the rank and file continually grumble about RINOs and the urgent need to get rid of turncoats like, um, Thad Cochran, of all people. So it may be that many of the nation's poor, ignorant, and above all belligerent white men will hardly notice a difference in years to come, because In their minds, they're barely represented right now.
@riotnrrd: Shorter and ruder version: They'll have to stop being such a**holes.
It's happening right now to my smallish, heretofore fairly obscure city in the southern USA. I've lived here for almost 10 years, and I've watched the "coolness" - restaurants, bars, galleries, boutiques, etc., many of them in formerly abandoned buildings - rise along an initially slow but steadily accelerating curve. At the moment, it's a great place to live, but in view of the astounding numbers of "luxury" apartments, condos, and hotels scheduled to open in the next couple of years, I'm pretty sure I need to get out of here before 2017. Some of the choicest property in my neighborhood is owned by a guy who was a big shot in the Bloomberg administration. If that isn't a harbinger of doom, I don't know what would be.