Posts tagged as Inconsistent Pleadings
Inconsistent Pleadings: What is the Internet If Not a Clearinghouse for All Manner of Off-Topic, Anal-Related Comments?
As in great works of literature, the narrative arc of judicial opinions is often apparent in the first line. Consider this opener from a recent California appeals court case: "A 15-year old high school student was pursuing a career in entertainment and maintained a Web site for that purpose." If I tell you that said website was comment-enabled, I probably don't need to add that this kid's electronic ode to himself became a repository of homophobic juvenalia within hours of its discovery by his classmates. READ MORE
Inconsistent Pleadings: Another Thing White People Like: Judging
The San Francisco Chronicle recently reported that Vaughn Walker, the James Coburn/Wilford Brimley look-alike who is overseeing the federal court challenge to California's Proposition 8, is gay. (Awkward!) Since the story broke, journalists and pajama-bloggers have debated whether it's appropriate for a gay man to adjudicate the constitutionality of a law aimed specifically at depriving gays of their rights. READ MORE
Inconsistent Pleadings: Smith v. Spisak and Mumia's Three Decades of Appeals
If you've ever spent any time on a college campus, chances are you've encountered a group of maybe-students with makeshift signs and ink-smeared pamphlets urging that you "Free Mumia." And if you bothered to grab a pamphlet or engage one of these activists, you would have discovered that "Mumia" is Mumia Abu-Jamal, who was convicted of the fairly brutal 1981 shooting death of 25-year-old Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner. Abu-Jamal has always claimed that he is innocent, and in the nearly thirty years since his conviction, his banner has been taken up by an array of frequent bedfellows: assorted civil rights groups, low-wattage celebrities, slices of the international community and college kids. READ MORE
Inconsistent Pleadings: When and How to Say "F***ing" At Work
For 2000 or so years, conventional medical wisdom/quack science held that various bodily substances, known collectively as the four humours, governed a person's physical and emotional disposition. I have my own four humours theory, which is basically that the only things people really find funny are cursing, typos, pratfalls and old people. (This means, for a lawyer, that your day job is about as amusing as a Chris Buckley piece.) READ MORE
Inconsistent Pleadings: ACLU v. Grayson County, or, America's Heritage
Among all the consequential pieces of federal legislation passed or proposed last year, you may have missed one gem: "America's Spiritual Heritage Resolution." Some salient facts about this bill: (1) it was co-sponsored by Michele Bachmann; (2) it relies heavily on the historical scholarship of Newt Gingrich; and, most obviously, (3) "America's Spiritual Heritage" is unequivocally Christian. The bill died in committee. But if you think you've heard the end of this type of thing, you haven't yet learned that Christian Fundamentalists are the hydra of American political theater. When one crazy idea gets axed, two more, bilious and hissing, sprout up in its place. READ MORE
