Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012
19

How Much More Do Comic Books Cost Today?

This is a big week for the comic book industry. On Friday (at midnight!), the first of the summer blockbusters, The Avengers, opens in the U.S. The Avengers is, of course, one of three superhero actioners to be released this summer, with The Dark Knight Rises and the reboot The Amazing Spider-Man on deck. Then on Saturday, it's Free Comic Book Day, with free offerings from publishers, big and small, hopefully drawing in hordes of potential customers to stores. As comic book writer Fred Van Lente told me, “It’s a good annual promotion to get fresh faces in the stores. I was flown in to at an event at Acme Comics in Greensboro, NC, where several thousand people showed up." And that would be a bang-up day for Acme, as, while comic-book heroes may be multiplying in Hollywood, the number of specialty comic book stores is dwindling.

We all have our memories of the first comic book we bought, whether we became what are popularly referred to (and no longer entirely pejoratively) as fanboys or not. And if the fanboy (or fangirl) bug bit, we also have the memories of that first subscription to have the comic books in your mailbox delivered monthly in a discreet brown paper wrapper, of that first trip to the comic book store, of that first time we were called a 'fanboy,' of that first time we realized that the fanboys were actually ruling the earth. Depending on your age, that first comic book was a handful of change, or a wadded up dollar bill or two. For me, I’m pretty sure my first was Brave and the Bold No. 121, a team-up of Batman and the Metal Men, purchased with a quarter given to me by my mom in a Charleston, West Virginia 7-11 in 1975. Coincidentally, adjusted to 2012 value, that quarter would be $1.07.

These days, if you decide to purchase a comic book, you will find that the prices of top-of-the-line books are $3.99. So that’s one book now for the four I’d have bought way back when. The question raised then, is why the steep hike in price? Are we looking at a huge spike in the cost of paper entertainment for little kids (and big kids) all over the country? And, if so, what the hell?

***

For our purposes here, let's stick to what they call "singles" or “pamphlets,” which is the term of art for the comic book in pamphlet form, the one that you think of when you think of "comic book" (and the one our grandparents thought of when they thought of “funny book”). For the past few decades, the industry has been making large profits off of graphic novels, which are, in most instances, collected reprints of singles, and currently the companies are also finding ways to exploit content digitally, because that’s what companies do. The rule of thumb is that graphic novel collections cost a bit less than what you would've spent buying the singles, and the price point for the digital singles are about even with the paper singles (though some companies are offering digital singles with paper purchase for a small surcharge).

We will tell you that your basic superhero comics are largely divided by two major companies, DC and Marvel, and you will know that. In fact, you will know the roster of characters of each (DC: Supes, Bats, Wonder Woman, et al; Marvel: Spidey, Cap, Iron Man and the other Marvelous Jack Kirby creations), down to the respective provenances of minor characters like Man-Thing and Black Lightning. And of course there have been competing companies: Fawcett Comics sold as many (and more) books featuring their Superman-like character Captain Marvel (the Shazam! Captain Marvel, of course) in the 40s. EC Comics garnered national attention in the 50s, as its gruesome (and lavishly illustrated) line of horror and war comics were singled out by a Dr. Frederic Wertham's cautionary Seduction of the Innocent: The Influence of Comic Books on Today's Youth. In fact, as we will see later, this was not so much a minor controversy but a full-blown hysteria, stoked by Wertham’s book, devoting hundreds of pages to cataloguing instances of depravity (stabbing eyeballs! protruding nipples!) poisoning the minds of the children of the Greatest Generation, resulting in a Senate Subcommittee Investigation (on Juvenile Delinquency!). Charlton was a mildly successful company that published characters in the 60s that DC would later acquire, and which characters Alan Moore would reimagine into the post-modern masterpiece, The Watchmen. And in the 90s, a coterie of fanboy favorite artists (including Rob Liefeld, heh) formed an upstart company, Image, which is still publishing today, as are Dark Horse and IDW. But as DC and Marvel are the iconic publishers of note, and as no other publisher other than DC and Marvel has a market share that even approaches ten percent, it's on Marvel and DC we will focus.

Of course, to be snarky we could now refer to DC and Marvel as Time Warner and Disney, and they are the respective owners (DC was purchased in 1969 by a company that later became Warner Communications, which later merged with Time Inc., etc., etc., and Marvel was bought by Disney not three years ago), but out of respect for tradition we'll eschew metonymy and stick with the initial entities. Which of course, in the interest of trivia, were not the initial entities. Actually, the companies we think of as Marvel and DC are what remained after decades and decades of merger and acquisition, and it’s a small miracle that they are both here with us today. For example, the company that first published such bedrock DC characters as the Flash and Green Lantern and Hawkman was All American Comics, owned by Max Gaines (later of EC Comics and Mad Magazine). In fact, even the characters Superman and Batman initially had separate publishers. Basically, the fevered hotbed of imagination that was New York in the Golden Age1 during the greatest period of success for comic books (at least in terms of circulation), was a sloppy internecine soup of entrepreneurialism with new companies being formed/bought/discarded almost as afterthought.

The prices of comic books over time are not that hard to dig up. In fact, more recently, any decent fanboy could recite the price increases of the past decade from memory. Though comic books were published for well a decade before, we will start in 1938, as the debut of Superman in Action Comics No. 1 is considered the birth of the superhero comics as we know them. It goes (with exceptions2 of course) like this:

1938: 10¢
1962: 12¢
1969: 15¢
1971: 20¢
1974: 25¢
1976: 30¢
1977: 35¢
1979: 40¢
1980: 50¢
1982: 60¢
1985: 65¢
1986: 75¢
1988: $1.00
1992: $1.25
1995: $1.50
1996: $1.95
1997: $1.99
2000: $2.25
2005: $2.50
2006: $2.99
2009: $3.99

As mentioned previously, there are books from the Majors (as Marvel and DC are referred collectively) selling for $2.99, but the Iron Man and Avengers titles, and DC’s Action Comics and Justice League, they're going for $3.99.

Now let’s just adjust those numbers for inflation, and, considering that the price held tight at ten cents for nearly 25 years, add in some dates in the 40s and 50s:

1938: $1.63
1943: $1.33
1948: $.95
1953: $.95
1958: $.86
1962: $.91
1969: $.94
1971: $1.13
1974: $.1.16
1976: $1.21
1977: $1.32
1979: $1.26
1980:: $1.39
1982: $1.43
1985: $1.39
1986: $1.57
1988: $1.94
1992: $2.04
1995: $2.26
1996: $2.85
1997: $2.94
2000: $3.00
2005: $2.94
2006: $3.40
2009: $4.27
2012: $3.99

That’s a pretty unambiguous progression right there: comic books are indeed getting more expensive. Up until the advent of the 70s, the price of a comic book was pretty much pegged to one dollar, give or take, and then began to slowly creep up, passing two dollars in the 90s and hitting the four dollar mark around the time Obama was elected. That's an increase from one dollar to four, or 400%, and remember that this increase that didn’t really start to kick until until after I was reading about the Metal Men saving Batman from being tied to a train (and developing an early appreciation of Jim Aparo). The spike is a relatively recent one.

***

For insight on why this ballooning inflation happened I turned to comic book professional Fred Van Lente, who was nice enough to chat with me. Van Lente co-created Cowboys Vs Aliens and has written the wildly successful Marvel Zombies and The Incredible Hercules. But aside from that, he wrote (and Ryan Dunleavy illustrated) the soon-to-be released The Comic Book History of Comics, collecting (and updating) their mini-series Comic Book Comics, which is just what it sounds like: the history of the comic book industry in sequential art form. (And if any of this is remotely interesting to you, I heartily recommend the book.)

According to Van Lente, one factor affecting the rising price of comics is the steady decline of the audience. “For me it’s the starkest example of how comics when they were first conceived were completely different then than they are now. Comics were originally priced cheap not only so kids could get them, but because you made your money in bulk.” Oft-cited estimates of the Market Research Company of America show that, in 1945, roughly half of all Americans read comic books, including 95% of all boys, and (and!) 91% of all girls, between the ages of six and eleven. “In 1947,” Van Lente added, “one out of every three periodicals sold in the United States was a comic book. That’s 180 million comics in one year.” To experience market penetration like that, you’d pretty much have to be the Internet. And if you glance at these lists of circulation figures for the time, you see that by 1946 you have four different comic book titles that were selling more than a million copies per month. (Whereas now, there are only three titles clearing (barely) two hundred thousand copies monthly.) So in comparing the 40s with now, we’re comparing a time when comic books were hands-down no-joke the undisputed dominant paradigm of entertainment for American children to now, a time when the characters and storylines of comics constitute a very American mythology while the vehicles that brought them there, the comic books themselves, sit off to the side. They are, after all, just one medium of a bucket-full lined up to entertain the kids these days. So basically, the market contracts, and to make up for lost volume, prices are raised. It happens all the time.

I asked Van Lente how this came about. “Basically, Frederic Wertham and television killed comics as a mass medium in the United States. In that, in the 1950s the hullaballoo around the Senate hearings and the criticism that comics were bad for kids and caused juvenile delinquency caused a real self-immolation of comics,” he said. By the 50s, the appetite for superhero comics was dwindling, while adult-themed comics, aimed at the generation that was raised by Superman and Captain Marvel and know full-grown adults, were flying off the shelves. “Any publisher who was producing non-kids fare was run out of business.” And it was that turbulent time that knee-capped comic books, and even with resurgences in the 60s (with the self-awareness of Spider-man and the Hulk, and the trippyness of the Fantastic Four and the Legion of Super-Heroes) and then the 90s (awash in a cascade of X-Men books and spin-offs), comics never regained their ubiquity in the United States, a ubiquity still enjoyed in Japan and France to this day.

But there’s another factor that Van Lente thinks is a proximate cause: the so-called direct market. For the first 40 years or so of the comic book industry, comics were just a periodical like any other, and distributed to newsstands (remember them?) and spinner racks in dime stores along with all the other magazines. And the way that periodical distribution worked is that, when the next issue of a magazine arrives, the unsold copies (or at least portions of the covers thereof, to demonstrate unsold-ness) were returned to the distributor for credit. It’s similar to how book distribution works, but it was a bit shadier, as distributors would battle over territories, and as the average newsstand magazine was not necessarily as irreplaceable a product as a bestselling novel. And comic books were the most second-class of the already second-class citizenry of periodicals, resulting in spotty and late distribution of titles based on the whims of the distributors.

By the 1970s, fandom as we know it was developing—starting newsletters, trading with and talking to fellow fans, taking the first steps from the primordial sea of readership into the genus of fanboy-fangirl— and some fans realized that in order to ensure that they would be able to get specific issues of a title in a timely manner, they would need to take matters into their own hands. So they set up a competing distribution model, ultimately resulting in the modern comic book shop. They began dealing with publishers directly, offering to do away with returns in exchange for a bigger wholesale discount than the newsstands got. Then they would sell these books through comic book stores, just beginning to pop up, and keep the unsold copies as backstock for the collector’s market. Hence, the Direct Market. (Notable pioneers in this endeavor include Phil Seuling, the father of the direct market, Bud Plant and Steve Geppi.) Van Lente covers this shift in The Comic Book History of Comics, excerpted here with permission, writing: "The Direct Market would grow by double digits every year for the next two decades."

It sounds good, right? Comic book stores as we know them today were born, as was the ability to ensure that you could buy a specific book the day it was released. But it had two ultimately devastating side effects. First, it eroded newsstand distribution of comics to a bare footnote, which means that an ever-decreasing portion of fanboy-fangirl generations get their first tastes from the spinner rack. Which barely matters, because the success of the Direct Market painted itself into a corner, as the market for comic books became more and more of a highly specialized niche. Said Van Lente, “If you have a shrinking pool of consumers, doing the R and D to expand that audience is expensive and risky. If you can’t get five people to buy one book, you get one person to buy five books.” And now since even the dominant distribution model is inadvertently engineering to choke growth of the market, publishers keep raising price points a) in order to make up for shrinking numbers, and b) because the very specialized market will bear it.

As previously noted by Van Lente, the comic book industry of today is nothing like what it used to be.

***

Okay then, maybe the skyrocketing price points of comic books are not solely the result of the greed of the publishers, but rather the result of an evolving industry, one in distribution models combined with decreasing demand have resulted in a product that can’t be sold for less. What of the future? I personally am pretty fond of the comic books, and I’d hate to see them go.

I reached out to Jimmy Aquino, host of the popular podcast Comic News Insider (already up to its 400th episode). “I fear if prices continue to get higher, then it will only hurt the industry. I've heard so many people say they have had to become more picky/choosy when it comes to comics since the prices have increased. Unfortunately, lack of sales will increase prices and increased prices will cause lack of sales,” Jimmy said via email. True, if a young/old fan has a certain budget for the comic books, and the comic books are four times more expensive than they were when fan’s grandfather was a child, then it will have to result in fewer books bought.

I also spoke to Wayne Quackenbush, the very charming proprietor of Annex! Comics in Newport, Rhode Island, one of the kinds of shops that is investing heavily in engaging with customers, offering not just items for sale but classes on sequential art and immersive 12-hour draw-ins (and also the last brick-and-mortar video rental store in Rhode Island, says Quackenbush—think about that for one second). One of his customers has described Annex! Comics as, “An oasis of culture in a sea of mediocrity,” which is an apt description of your finer comic book store as you’ll find, mixed metaphor notwithstanding. And of course while comic book stores vend a great many items—back issues, statuettes, games and other accoutrements of nerd culture— the new books, on sale each Wednesday or Thursday (depending where in the country you are). I asked him how’s business, and he answered, “Business is terrible, but that’s not because of comic books, but because of the Not-so-Great Depression and being in Rhode Island.” But business has been stable since Quackenbush took over the store in 1998.

But what of the threat of digital publishing (which is by no means unique to comic books)? “I know that the Majors are working towards getting rid of pamphlets that they sell, that they’re going to try to be all digital as soon as possible, because that cuts out the middleman—namely me,” said Quackenbush. But if you talk to older fans, you do hear a reticence to accept this digital future. Some of the appeal of the comic book (maybe nostalgic, or soon to be) is the tactile. “I am still one of those who enjoy the visceral feel of a comic as opposed to reading digital,” says Aquino. As Quackenbush put it, “I’ve never met anyone that would prefer to read a digital comic book.” And of course there is the comics collecting industry. Go into Annex! Comics, or your own personal comics store, and you will see boxes and boxes of old comics, artifacts for sale at sometimes quite the premium, depending on age and significance. If comics move to an all-digital future, there won't be a market for rare and immaculately preserved digital books, as the digital nature of the product obviates both of those qualities.

And digital publication is not the only threat to the future of comic books. There are concerns that the Majors will someday abandon pamphlets completely in favor of graphic novels, or other books published in trade paperback format. “There’s talk that the 32 page flimsy, floppy pamphlet may be going away,” said Quackenbush. And Aquino wrote, “I think singles will be a thing of the past as many companies are already leaning towards just developing original graphic novels or are just making mini-series of 4-6 single issues with the goal to collect them into a trade for profit.”

***

For the record, the first comic book bought by Van Lente was Incredible Hulk No. 265, for fifty cents from a spinner rack. For Quackenbush it was Eerie No. 4 in 1964 (actually more a magazine than a single, but still) for thirty-five cents (which he saved up for two weeks), and Aquino’s first was a Richie Rich digest (again, not a single) for fifty cents in 1975 from the local Pic N’ Save.

“I learned how to read from comic books,” adds Quackenbush, “It’s a great way for parents to get their kids to read.” That’s a huge point. Comics obviously occupy solid ground in American culture, and this summer’s box office receipts are only one aspect of this solid position. The video games, the TV shows, the ancillary products—comics are certainly going nowhere. But what might be going somewhere soon is the actual comic book itself. And the utility of comic books, no matter what Dr. Frederic Wertham thought a half-century ago, is partly that you’re putting something in the hands of the youngsters that makes them want to read. I also learned how to read from comics, and how to think visually, and just how to enjoy stories, which has fueled me throughout my life.

The singles, the pamphlets, may be destined for the dustbin of history (or a purely digital future?), but it’s not merely nostalgia that makes me argue that that would be a very sad thing.



1 When we refer to the “Golden Age,” that would be the period from 1938 until the Werthamite Inquisition in the 50s, the most prosperous period in comic book history. The “Silver Age” runs from 1956, when DC rebooted the character of the Flash, and spans the Pop-Art success of Marvel Comics and the Batman television show. The “Bronze Age” covers from 1970 to the mid-80s, during which comic books flirted with grown-up themes (and the industry largely flagged). The “Modern Age” is used to describe from ‘85 until now, but hopefully someone will think of a more colorful appellation.

2 While the price point of the singles are uniform as a function of time, the majors did publish books that deviated. DC's Eighty Page Giants were popular in the 60s and early 70s, packaging eighty pages of reprint material in a single for about twice the price of a single, and later in the 70s they published certain titles (such as Batman Family and World’s Finest) as Dollar Comics, which offered 48 ad-free pages. At roughly the same time Marvel sold these mind-bending 10” by 13” reprint books called Marvel Treasury Editions, which were just over-sized enough to make a little kid feel like he or she make actually fall into the comic book (which is pretty much the point of the exercise). And as fandom exploded in the 80s, the majors would introduce new formats, such as books with glossier paper and better quality printing, or content for mature audiences, which would be sold at a modest premium, as was a premium added to some books available exclusively through the Direct Market.

And we'd be doing a disservice to not at least mention the independent publishers, which we excluded as their prices do not necessary fall in lockstep with the Big Two, and hence throw the numbers all over the place. Take, for example, Cerebus. When Dave Sim launched his iconic independent series in 1977, the cover price was one dollar. Meanwhile, were you to grab a copy of Marvel Two-in-One (a team up book featuring Fantastic Four’s the Thing, oddly), say No. 29, wherein he teams with the Master of Kung Fu, the cover price was thirty cents, as were all the other books from the Big Two. Sim did not have the benefit of the guarantee of tens of thousands of copies sold. For the venture to be viable for Sim, he had to charge enough so that if he sold a couple thousand copies, he would have enough left over after expenses to pay the rent. Sim was of course not the only writer/artist going it alone at the time—Richard and Wendy Pini’s WaRP Graphics experienced success with their own Elfquest and Colleen Doran’s A Distant Soil, and, later, Kevin Eastman’s and Peter Laird’s Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles went on to be its own cottage industry, and of course before that there were a plethora of underground “comix” that were published in the late 60’s and onward, featuring such talents as R. Crumb and Gilbert Sheldon. By the way, those prices converted to current value would be $3.70 for Cerebus, and $1.14 for Marvel Two-in-One. The Indies don’t necessarily work for the purposes of this piece, but we should always support them in any event.


Previously What It Cost Eight Women Writers To Make It In New York



Brent Cox is all over the Internet.

19 Comments / Post A Comment

Matt (#26)

TOO DAMN MUCH.

Matt (#26)

Like, I really enjoy the stuff that, say, a Grant Morrison was just doing with Batman and what he's doing with Superman now, but I'm not going to buy comics at those bloated prices week in and week out. I'll wait for the trades and then wait for the trades to come out in paperback and then wait for the paperbacks to be slashed to half price on Amazon and that is the only way I deal with the big two anymore.

Remember when we wanted to smash giant corporations, not "save them" out of a misplaced sense of nostalgia? Me neither, says the guy with an unlicensed Joker face for an avatar.

DoctorDisaster (#1,970)

Another major change that was only obliquely touched on here: comics are no longer "periodicals" in the sense that people consider periodicals disposable. You throw away old newspaper or magazine issues, but comic readers keep their back issues almost without exception. Floppies are a vestige of a time when this wasn't the case, and in the current market they're not only a stupid business model, but a real pain in the ass to keep around.

Worse, because you have to pay for each installment AND the convenient collected trade, you are faced with a choice: either you get the community-building effect that comes with experiencing a serial story as part of a larger audience, OR you get a manageable collection, OR you pay double to get both.

If comics want to go mainstream again, they will have to adopt the more sensible model of newspaper strips and TV shows: get the installments free or nearly free (with ad support), then pay for the collection. It baffles me that no one has done the obvious thing and offered a trade paperback pre-order that comes with access to free digital singles as the series unfolds.

TimothyVolpert (#232,960)

this is a great article, but it was in pretty dire need of some editing, enough so that it really hindered my enjoyment of the piece. extra and missing words, misplaced punctuation, parentheses opened then never closed. it got really confusing in places :(

TimothyVolpert (#232,960)

In other news, if The Awl is looking for a proofreader I am looking for a job ;D

LondonLee (#922)

I read a lot of Marvel comics in my youth but stopped at some point in the 80s. Now my daughter has developed a love of old Wonder Woman and Archie comics so I've been taking her to our local emporium but, besides being so pricey, 99% of the new ones are unsuitable for kids. I picked up a Supergirl thinking this would be cool for a little girl and I was shocked at how bloody and violent it was – Supergirl! And they're so fucking serious too, all these superheroes are sitting around having moody conversations. The fun has completely gone out of them. I blame Frank Miller and Alan Moore personally.

And who can keep up with the 1,000 versions of each title there seem to be these days? No wonder Marvel and DC have to keep re-booting their universes.

RonMwangaguhung (#3,697)

when comic books were 0.60 cents they were the bestest #nostalgiedelaboue

Comic books were printed on cheap paper that deteriorates over time. That's one reason why the first appearances of Superman and Batman are worth so much: the number of decent copies that survive are limited. The paper comics today are printed on, the quality of the printing process itself, are much, much higher. The comics that would cost $1.00 when adjusted for inflation don't exist now. No one prints on that cheap paper using cheap printing.

Oscar Zoalaster (#233,032)

I wonder how much of the increase in the cost of comics is the improved printing and higher grade paper? I strongly suspect that even with the other price inputs that you described that comics would be a lot cheaper if they were printed in the way they were in the 1960's and 1970's.

DanZee (#245,448)

@Oscar Zoalaster Printing on click magazine paper only adds a few cents per issue. Going back to cheap pulp paper would not decrease the cost of the comics.

The industry has a lot of problems, some it created for itself, others created by outside forces. For example, newsstands in the 1970s complained about the cheap price of comics and having to track dozens of titles for orders and returns. The comics companies raised prices, but newsstands were only making pennies per issue. In the 1980s, Marvel saw a way to bypass distributors and go direct market, but when that boom busted, and comic stores went out of business, the comics industry imploded as well. The fewer comics sold, the higher the prices were raised. Disney and Warner can make billions from movies and merchandising, but comics sales are stuck in the basement. No one has really come up with a solution that makes economic sense.

JohnJacksonMiller (#233,079)

Interesting piece! As my site was referenced, I wanted to share a couple of thoughts.

First, unlike comics sales on the newsstand in the old days, when there was only one bite at the apple, new comics sales in the direct market are by no means reflective any more of how much a comics story will earn. As this post on 2011 sales shows…

http://blog.comichron.com/2012/02/big-picture-bookscan-comics-shops-and.html

…new comics are less than half of the industry's revenue, and more than a third of the business is outside comics shops again, a big reversal of the trend of the 1980s and 1990s. Trade paperbacks are to thank for both facts.

And as for the trade paperback eliminating the comic book, this has been well debated in the field for many years. It's unlikely to happen in part because otherwise, the work simply won't get done. Comic writers and artists don't get big advances to go away and create for six months; we need the work to be generating income as it goes. Dave Sim of Cerebus, who you mentioned, told me in an interview once that he never could have produced 6,000 pages a graphic novel at a time. Serialization doesn't just subsidize and advertise the eventual larger work — it enforces discipline, to a degree. The magazine roots of comics are one reason the medium is so prolific.

There are many paths to making a comic book, but serialization will likely always be in there somewhere. In a sense, each $3 or $4 comic book is its own Kickstarter contribution, making sure there will be a graphic novel someday.

@JohnJacksonMiller Do you think a combination of digital singles with printed TPBs could be a workable model?

JohnJacksonMiller (#233,079)

@Klint Finley Webcomics producers go straight from digital to the collected edition all the time, but currently the amount of revenue isn't anywhere close to what would be needed for most publishers. Digital dollars are still roughly on the order of what subscription dollars traditionally were for monthly comics — a nice extra, but not yet transformative. Digital does serve the same need that subscriptions once did, in a sense, helping those not near a comics shop — and it does seem to be additive, in the sense that publishers' legitimate digital offerings don't seem to be directly reducing sales of the print versions. I think what we probably wind up with is digital as a third leg to the stool, not replacing monthlies but rather representing an additional delivery option.

It's also worth noting that the "collecting industry" as mentioned above remains in fine health — the aftermarket adding a nine-figure sum to the business annually. Comics from before when people knew to save them have held their value regardless of the many reprint options before, and continue to do so now with the additional digital channel.

In general, I think the digital-versus-print distinction is much overblown. If you think about it, the availability of comics online has increased every year — and, yet, so too have industry revenues through most years of the 2000s, not counting the recent recession. Periodical units in aggregate also increased many of those years, and are increasing again now. The thanks is largely due to trade paperbacks, of course — but we can say that print versions of comics are indisputably in front of many more eyes, and in many more locations, than they were 10 years ago. Digital just adds a channel.

These numbers are way outdated, but I can only assume that executive salaries also contribute to the cost of comics: http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=13443

Now that Marvel and DC are both owned by major media conglomerates (Disney and Warner Bro, respectively), how much of the profit from comics is being siphoned off by corporate owners? How does executive compensation at those parent companies compare, adjusted to inflation, to the salaries of executives at Marvel and DC back in the 60s?

The rise of the direct market isn't entirely a bad thing. Although newsstands, and now book stores, bring in new readers and expand the market behind specialty shops, they create huge risks for publishers. Publishers like Comico were driven out of business by newsstand returns, and Devil's Due suspended publication for a couple years because of book store returns on trades. Publishers that stay out of those markets can create smaller but more sustainable businesses.

Gevian Dargan (#233,216)

I think the fact that companies are using more expensive paper is not being addressed. And quite frankly, labor costs are an issue. The fact that many creators have exclusive contracts with page rates that are not justified by the industry's sales needs to be addressed as well. Distribution is an issue and can be easily resolved by getting production costs under control and more in line to where the industry can grow as opposed to trying to sustain the foolish, foolish mistakes of the past. As Dan Didio said, readers have been leaving for years (Perleman started the exodus, especially for me) and they've been papering it over by increasing cover prices. I think nothing is going to change as long as the industry is looking for the change to come from Marvel or DC…because it's not. New 52 may address issues of editorial content but it doesn't deal with the industry's marketing issues (product, price, and place). Change has to come from an enterprising publisher who is willing to think outside the box in terms of the publishing business i.e labor costs and marketing strategy.

Another consideration is the style of writing. By the late '70s both the Marvel and DC universes had become comfortable and familiar places I was happy to visit several times a month. They shared a particular house style of art and, for the most part, had consistent editors who kept their respective universes pretty consistent. If a new neighbor moved in next to Steve Rogers, we knew about it and he was going to be there regardless of what title one was reading.
Today, the art and storytelling are wildly inconsistent, the details and characterizations are entirely unreliable, and each universe gets re-created every few years. Wolverine appears in most every title, and yet he may as well be a different character in each of those titles.
I don't buy comics anymore because my old universe isn't there anymore, and I see no percentage in getting to know a new one that has no internal rules and won't even be there in five years.

Erik Larsen@twitter (#239,293)

That comics didn't go up in price for 25 years is a bit deceptive because when they first came out in the '30s they were 64-pages of cover-to-cover content for 10¢ and when they ended they were 32-pages long with at least eight pages of advertising.

Similarly along the way there were other adjustments. Although the 32-page booklet format remained standard, story page counts fluctuated wildly. They dwindled in an effort to keep down the cover price and then expanded with price jumps. Standard length stories were as short as 17-pages and as long as 25-pages.

There was a huge packaging shift starting in the '90s in response to Image Comics which had made a huge splash with upscale printing, paper, color and content. Books at Marvel and DC emulated their titles, making stories bloodier, sexier and then using better paper and computer colors. Yes, a standard comic book in 2009 is more expensive than the one from 1990 but it's a different product in a way. The real problem for the consumer is, of course, there are no less expensive alternatives. If you want to read Amazing Spider-Man your only option is to fork over $3.99. There are no less expensive options.

ScottM58 (#249,312)

I actually remember when comics cost 10 cents and then went up to 15(what a terrible outrage!)I grew up in the 1960s and turned 12 in September of 1970.Everything has changed so much since then that sometimes I really feel old.A bottle of pop was a dime.When a little younger I'd get a weekly allowance of 50 cents which would get you a lot of stuff back then.I could buy a bunch of penny candies,a bag of chips,a pop and still have enough for a comic! Hard to believe but true.

Post a Comment