24
Oh, The Gay Divorces
The best part of the GET READY FOR GAY DIVORCE stories are the anecdotes, like this couple who shared "a love of fur coats and gold jewelry": "The two are now in the messy process of untangling their lives—a web that has grown to include four purebred Rhodesian Ridgebacks, three houses, and one financially dependent parent." (Instead of letting them get gay-divorced, couldn't we just exile them to Antarctica? Won't someone think of the Ridgebacks?) Anyway, gay divorce: pro or con? Totally pro, right?
To punish them for flying too close to the sun that is marriage, they should be punished by being forced to stay married forever and ever.
Ruining the sanctity of marriage is for straight people. The Bible says so.
Are we absolutely sure Rhodesian Ridgebacks aren't a thing from Harry Potter? Because I'm pretty sure that would be just the element of whimsy to tie the whole story together.
@DoctorDisaster ACCIO FUR COAT!
Isn't finally learning the horror of having their mothers blurt out to their new boyfriends "Well, you seem far more stable than Doug" punishment enough?
I don't know what's wrong with these kids today!
The picture raises another question. Who is this generation's Paul Lynde?
@Ham_Snadwich Paul Lynde is every generation's Paul Lynde!! <3<3<3
@barnhouse I mean, we've been making due with Charles Nelson Reilly for way too long.
@Ham_Snadwich
It would be Graham Norton, if Americans didn't just assume all English guys are like that.
@Ham_Snadwich Roger, from American Dad?
@City_Dater I believe Norton is Irish.
@KenWheaton Good call.
File me "against". All people should be part of a gay-married couple. No divorce should be allowed (this would result in the existence of people who were not gay-married), however you are allowed to swap partners with someone else.
@cory dodt@twitter But really quickly, like Indy swapping the sack of sand for the gold idol. Wait too long and a boulder falls on you!
Also your new gay partner has to weigh the same amount as the old one.
But can't they just chop the financially-dependent parent in half? I don't see the problem!
@MikeBarthel Medicare doesn't cover bisection-related complications.
@deepomega: this is why we need those damn Death Panels.
@deepomega Bisectional divorce is another issue entirely!
It could be worse; they could co-own the Dodgers.
Doesn't this need a WHAT ABOUT THE KURDS tag?
I don't think three houses is enough space for four Rhodesian Ridgebacks. They're large, see.
It's not a breakup, it's a breakover?
Someone asked who is the new Paul Lynde? I vote for Pastor Ted Haggard (Separated at Birth material…) http://www.ratdiary.com/wp-content/themes/impact/img/ted3.jpg
Divorce is divorce, of course.