Tuesday, June 28th, 2011
11

"All in all, it was a pretty positive, if somewhat anticlimactic, experience. I tried to act as normal as possible, but it’s hard not to smile when you’re doing something so obviously goofy. I don’t think it’s yet possible for a woman to walk around topless without having people assume she’s pulling some sort of stunt, which is a shame. Granted, I was doing a social experiment of sorts, but it would be nice to be able to do it just because it feels good."
—Jamie Peck of The Gloss takes a topless stroll through Central Park. WARNING: Includes boobs.

11 Comments / Post A Comment

BadUncle (#153)

If nothing else, this keeps America tube-topless.

LondonLee (#922)

You obviously realize that "WARNING: Includes boobs" pretty much guarantees a link that's going to be clicked don't you?

deepomega (#1,720)

Cho's gonna be piiiiiiiissed about the SEDeoptimization in that headline.

MikeBarthel (#1,884)

@deepomega Google has a surprisingly robust boob-detection algorithm.

MythReindeer (#5,553)

@MikeBarthel Surprisingly?

hman (#53)

Aww, I kept waiting for her to smoke a cigarette in the park too, while she was at it.

ejcsanfran (#489)

What's boob for the goose is boob for the gander.

She does have great Frederick Law Olmsteds! Good on ya, Jamie Peck.

SeanP (#4,058)

@DorothyMantooth Huge… tracts of land!

joeclark (#651)

Female toplessness has been explicitly legal in Ontario since circa 1996 when Gwen Jacobs went to court over it and won.

Post a Comment