Tuesday, May 31st, 2011
8

Do Not Under (Almost) Any Circumstances Buy a Home

Bank of America is paying just $20 million for having foreclosed improperly on 160 active-duty military service personnel. (This, of course, was frequent predatory lender suit-settler Countrywide in action; Bank of America purchased Countrywide in January, 2008, for $4.1 billion in stock, and has paid for it more and more ever since, including the former CEO's SEC settlements.) But $20 million! That's nothing, in the grand scheme of the forthcoming housing disaster. For one thing, there are about half as many foreclosed houses being sold now as there were two years go: at this new pace, "it would take exactly three years to clear the current inventory of 1.9 million properties already on the banks’ books, or in foreclosure." And then there will be no houses in foreclosure! Just kidding. There'll be tons more! Both new ones, and let's not forget that litigation has stalled a huge number of foreclosures. All that will get dumped on the market, even as housing prices are down 33.1 percent from summer of 2006 and 28% of all single-family mortgages are underwater.

8 Comments / Post A Comment

freetzy (#7,018)

Rent? Why bother? It's the golden age of exurban squatters.

dntsqzthchrmn (#2,893)

Call me when the landlords start begging to be re-enrolled in stabilization. Until then? New York is not worth it.

deepomega (#1,720)

Bad news for homeowners. Great news for first-time buyers.

dntsqzthchrmn (#2,893)

@deepomega: Maybe… rates look good now. But if prices are nowhere near their floor… and employers decide they need another round of fixing their budgets the only way anybody knows how anymore, namely cutting heads, well… glub glub.

skyslang (#11,283)

…aaaaand rents go up. People will start buying again when they realize their mortgage is cheaper than their rent.

Slapdash (#174)

@skyslang You mean when people realize that their mortgage + property tax + insurance + upkeep (and that includes time, hassle, and trips to Home Depot) is cheaper than their rent.

The mortgage deduction may tip things in favor of ownership. Then again, flat or declining market rates (i.e. a negative return on equity) may continue to work in factor of renting. But mortgage alone? That's just a fraction of it.

@Slapdash This is actually true in my case. Similar houses in the area are renting for what I'm paying for the above. Also, someone actually owns the places that are being rented out. They have to pay for property taxes, insurance, upkeep, and the mortgage.

Abe Sauer (#148)

Do Not Under (Almost) Any Circumstances Buy a Home in Certain Neighborhoods.

There, fixed.

Post a Comment