Monday, January 3rd, 2011
20

"Since 1973, countless lives that might have been welcomed into families like Thernstrom’s—which looked into adoption, and gave it up as hopeless—have been cut short in utero instead. And lives are what they are. On the MTV special, the people around Durham swaddle abortion in euphemism. The being inside her is just 'pregnancy tissue.' After the abortion, she recalls being warned not to humanize it: 'If you think of it like [a person], you’re going to make yourself depressed.' Instead, 'think of it as what it is: nothing but a little ball of cells.' It’s left to Durham herself to cut through the evasion. Sitting with her boyfriend afterward, she begins to cry when he calls the embryo a 'thing.' Gesturing to their infant daughter, she says, 'A ‘thing’ can turn out like that. That’s what I remember … ‘Nothing but a bunch of cells’ can be her.' When we want to know this, we know this."
The arguer in me wants me to seize upon the word "want" in that last sentence, and tell Ross Douthat, Sure, yes, when we want to believe something, so as to make the world line up with our personal religious inclination, we can make ourselves—we can blur the line between personal experience and logic, and, semantically, between "believing" and "knowing," too. But that is a type of cheating. And it doesn't change the fact that abortion should be kept legal and available to any pregnant woman who so chooses. But the reader in me is thankful for a compelling challenge to my own views.

20 Comments / Post A Comment

Tulletilsynet (#333)

Would the arguer in you be revising the columnist's copy just a little bit?

roboloki (#1,724)

i wish patricia snow had opted for an abortion.
also, it sounds like douchehat should tour a slaughterhouse.

barnhouse (#1,326)

Poor old Doubtthat. So many things to be afraid of.

Bryan Keller (#3,804)

Douthat has the look of someone who gets into some really strange porn.

deepomega (#1,720)

The things Douthat finds erotic are honestly not even classified as porn. They are images which bring him to erection, certainly, but anyone else who saw them would think it was a low-budget basic cable talk show about flexible chefs.

C_Webb (#855)

I can't believe I'm sticking up for Douchehat, and should make clear before I get harshed on that I'm vehemently pro-choice. However, the "want" doesn't apply only to religious belief. It also applies to what kind of pregnancy is at issue — as in, my two children were referred to as "babies" (i.e. "I'm having a baby") as soon as I knew I was pregnant, because I wanted them. However, if I got knocked up now, I'd most likely be a temporary host to a "bunch of cells." And I guess I can see why that would make a religious person's head explode.

Tulletilsynet (#333)

Let a thousand flowers bloom, let a hundred schools of thought contend, as long as they are all pro-choice.

Dave Bry (#422)

That's a nice reading of it and I agree about the sympathy towards exploding religious people's heads. Its good to see how we might be making other people's heads explode, even as they so often do the same to ours. Thanks, C Webb.

CydM (#9,276)

Hi, new around here and lovin' it. It seems the heads of religious people have already imploded. Abortion is wrong because it's messing with God's power as the creator of life, yet plenty of good Christians have no problem messing with that power if they can't get pregnant. Fertility clinics abound, and not a single protest, at least that I'm aware of it, outside those doors because people are creating life where God has already decided there should be none. You just can't have it both ways. I'm still gobsmacked that I've stumbled on a place where people actually enjoy challenging their own views. Is this an alternate reality?

ep (#8,509)

And to further confound the medical ethicist in us all, has a woman who has miscarried lost her baby or lost a bunch of cells — and is the distinction dependent on whether she was decorating a nursery or sitting in an abortion clinic waiting room at the time?

hockeymom (#143)

In between Child #1 and Child #2, there was Something Else.
I heard its heartbeat on my first visit to the doctor. Did not hear a heartbeat on the second.
An ultrasound revealed an empty womb. Nothing was there. And the only explanation given was, "Sometimes things disappear and we don't know why."

This was a long time ago and I still wonder about it.

C_Webb (#855)

@HMom: That's … haunting. Hope you're ok.

hockeymom (#143)

I'm fine, thanks…not haunted. I think a lot of miscarriages end up being mysteries and that's just the way it goes. But the bunch of cells vs. baby question has crossed my mind.

Scum (#1,847)

There is no bunch of cells vs baby question. Of course the developing child is a bunch of cells; a baby is a bunch of cells, a 40 year old man is a bunch of cells. Using cold, inhuman language to describe human beings does not diminish their humanity. It's cheap semantic obfuscation

The arguer in me wants to point out to this asshole that it's not anyone else's responsibility (particularly not the "working-class and undereducated") to provide white infants for adoption by infertile affluent people. Seriously, what?

City_Dater (#2,500)

I do so hope his next column is about bringing back workhouses. After all, if we're going to force girls with limited options into bearing unwanted childen and donating them to infertile yuppies, we're probably also going to have to find a place to dump their shiftless, unskilled boyfriends.

s. (#775)

You can't spell "that douche" without Douthat.

deepomega (#1,720)

Working under the frankly insane suggestion that there is a shortage of adoptable children. What?

DoctorDisaster (#1,970)

But I want a prettier one!

Leon Saint-Jean (#6,596)

re: the "Waking up from the pill" Quote: “to forget about the biological realities of being female … inadvertently, indirectly, infertility has become the Pill’s primary side effect.”

Isn't one of the biological realities of being a woman, if you are going to be all evolution-y about it, being pregnant about 50% of the time you are over 15, until you die at 35?

Deducing an "ought" from an "is" – or a was, as it is?

Post a Comment