Tuesday, November 9th, 2010
9

I dunno, this made me laugh: "This article was amended on 8 November 2010. The original had 'sceptic' tank, and we're sure the writer meant septic. This has been corrected." I'm picturing the tank curling a suspicious eyebrow and being all, "I don't buy it." Like the Dr. House of toilets. But maybe that's just me.

9 Comments / Post A Comment

KarenUhOh (#19)

The content provider could not be reached for comment.

gumplr (#66)

I bet he thinks his shit don't stink.

KenWheaton (#401)

You're taking word geekery to new lows. In fact I'd say you're dragging it right down into the sewer.

MollyculeTheory (#4,519)

You must be flush with pride at your observation.

KenWheaton (#401)

You kidding me? I'm totally pooped.

Matt (#26)

It made me laugh too!

scroll_lock (#4,122)

They got the error twice as rong- as "skeptic" is the correct spelling.

MollyculeTheory (#4,519)

Knifecrime spelling (or should I say cnifecrime?)

scroll_lock (#4,122)

Ye Olde Cnifecryme

Post a Comment