5
"There is a ruling with legal force where a man was acquitted for the same reason after having peed behind a container. The court of appeal found then, just as we have, that the intent to offend or offensiveness in and of itself, was lacking."
-Annika Johansson, district court judge in Nacka, Sweden, explains that she threw out the charges against a man arrested in March for illegal public urination because he "went behind a bus shelter to relieve himself, taking care to keep his back toward the sidewalk."






Behind a container?
Container = dumpster?
So that's what I've been doing wrong all these years!
This would have proved useful in college.
This is embarrassing for many of us. But, may that person didn't care about it anymore. The Local records that a Swedish court recently acquitted a 45-year-old man of his fee for urinating in public. The Nacka resident (Nacka is a suburb of Stockholm) tried to pee without offending everyone, which was enough for the Stockholm court to drop charges.