Monday, September 27th, 2010
5

"There is a ruling with legal force where a man was acquitted for the same reason after having peed behind a container. The court of appeal found then, just as we have, that the intent to offend or offensiveness in and of itself, was lacking."
-Annika Johansson, district court judge in Nacka, Sweden, explains that she threw out the charges against a man arrested in March for illegal public urination because he "went behind a bus shelter to relieve himself, taking care to keep his back toward the sidewalk."

5 Comments / Post A Comment

mathnet (#27)

Behind a container?

Container = dumpster?

LondonLee (#922)

So that's what I've been doing wrong all these years!

This would have proved useful in college.

Josh E (#7,736)

This is embarrassing for many of us. But, may that person didn't care about it anymore. The Local records that a Swedish court recently acquitted a 45-year-old man of his fee for urinating in public. The Nacka resident (Nacka is a suburb of Stockholm) tried to pee without offending everyone, which was enough for the Stockholm court to drop charges.

Post a Comment