Friday, September 10th, 2010
19

Off to the Movies? Would You Like Some World Peace And/Or Pepsi?

PEPSIIt's only in the last ten years or so that we in the US began seeing commercials before the movie. The exotic and bizarre cinema-going experience in the UK, which once included not only the opportunity to buy cocktails in the lobby and to smoke (usually in the balcony) during the movie (I know, gross, whatever, I am just saying-it was a lot worse on the plane, believe me), has featured commercials for about forever. I had a special fondness for the hallucinogenic Babycham ones ("Nothing sparkles like a Babycham!").

Complaints about this relatively new practice in the U.S. seem to have fallen on deaf ears, in part because moviegoers don't seem to mind seeing a few commercials before the trailers, while they are still blabbing with their mates and eating popcorn. The revenues are perfectly staggering: well over half a billion dollars in 2008. Recent news indicates that we'll be seeing more and more such commericals, with some firms promising to screen "advertainment" (#$*!) programs of up to 20 minutes' duration before the movie.

I bring this up because of the Pepsi ad that has been running at the Five Star Los Feliz 3 for the last month or two.

It features reasonably appealing music-video graphics set to the Black-Eyed Peas song "One Tribe," and touts the Pepsi Refresh Project, which aims to "give millions in grants to refresh individuals and communities." This attempt to "rebrand" the idea of community involvement or charitable works with the Pepsi-related term "refreshment" is weird enough on its own. But there is more to it.

In sharp contrast to the "stand apart ad" that Thomas Frank and David Foster Wallace dissected with such brilliance (in The Conquest of Cool and "E Unibus Pluram" [PDF], respectively,) showing how notions of "individuality" and "uniqueness" were successfully coopted in order to sell you stuff in the late 20th century ("as unique as you are," that sort of thing), Pepsi's "One Tribe" ad attempts to take ownership of the idea of community and social responsibility. Because you're watching it in a real community, instead of alone in front of the TV-and I would argue that the closest many of us can feel to a group of strangers is in an audience for entertainment, whether at a movie theater, a sporting event or a nightclub-the implications are that much more intrusive and disquieting.

After the campaign to seduce consumers into parting with their cash by appealing to their "individuality" and "rebellion" lost steam, advertisers developed a more transgressive line. By the 1990s, commercials almost uniformly sought to out-ironize their audience, as Zack Stentz wrote:

[T]he medium has stifled mockery and opposition by beating viewers to the punch and doing the mocking for them. By gently making fun of itself or its own advertisers, be it in a David Letterman monologue or smirking ESPN Sports Center promotion, television lets the watcher feel superior to the common herd and in on the joke, even while he or she is still glued to the sofa.

Pepsi was heavily invested in this approach; Mark C. Miller wrote brilliantly in Deride and Conquer (1986) about the Pepsi "Choice of a Generation" commercial that featured a horde of thirsty beachgoers stampeding to a Pepsi vendor en masse the moment the sound of fizzing soda poured over ice is broadcast along the hot, sunny beach. Commenting on Miller, Wallace noted that "[t]here's about as much "choice' at work in this commercial as there was in Pavlov's bell kennel. [...] the point of this successful bit of advertising is that Pepsi has been advertised successfully."

Pepsi has by now perfected its strategy of creating an artificial connection in your mind between its sugary fizzy obesity-promoting tooth-rotting brown fluid and all sorts of attractive ideas-individuality, ironic awareness and now, just like other companies, it has turned to charity, a green earth and general do-gooding. The sentimental will.i.am may seem to have grown troublingly fame-whoring after the success of his "Yes We Can" video, but there is no question that his music is stirring in just the button-pushing way that Pepsi can exploit really well in order to make these false new connections.

Not unlike the "Yes We Can" video, "One People"-and this ad is the product of TBWA\Chiat\Day, by the way-concerns itself with beliefs dear to the hearts of many ("we are one people," etc.). And it uses its possibly familiar imagery very well.

But instead of promoting a relatively progressive presidential candidate to a desperate, heartsore electorate, however, this song is flogging soda.

Maybe all this looks benign enough on the outside, like any other Trojan horse does at first. After all, the change (as in coinage) that Pepsi is handing out to all these worthy causes amounts to quite a lot in non-corporate-behemoth terms, and of course that is a good thing. (Pepsi, like all corporations, has charitable giving programs and is also publishing the grants issued under the "Refresh" program.)

But consider what happens when we feel something of significance to have been cheapened and coarsened by its use in advertising. We can hardly even stand it when they use "Ceremony" in an Absolut ad, because a commercial impulse seems to be intruding on what used to be the hallowed ground of pure, disinterested belief or appreciation. Now here is Pepsi, engaging in the co-opting of people's fondest, most distant hopes, such as racial unity and peace and restoring the forests, and then art-directing and Autotuning and rewrapping them all into a glossy, easily-digested package distributed before the movie, in the interest of profit. And still worse, it's all being used to make a buck in that rare atmosphere where strangers really do feel a vestigial sense of community. It gets sick when you consider all those diabetic teenagers and millions of empty aluminum cans and lakes of never-decaying two-liter PET bottles out in the Pacific Ocean.

Maybe it won't take long for the mockery of "One People" to spread around the culture, because of how cheap and sorry the underlying motives are, and how even-cheaper and more useless and destructive the actual product is. I should really hate to hear "one people y'all" become an ironic little joke for teenagers to make when they see news stories of a race riot or a gay-bashing, but I can already see it coming.



Maria Bustillos is the author of Dorkismo: The Macho of the Dork and Act Like a Gentleman, Think Like a Woman.

19 Comments / Post A Comment

LondonLee (#922)

Actually when I was a kid I think you could smoke anywhere at the movies in England, then when I was a teenager and smoking myself they reserved the left side of of the theatre for it. The seats used to have ashtrays in the arm rests.

I mostly remember the commercials being of the cheapo variety for local businesses – "after the film why not enjoy a meal at the Taj Mahal Indian restaurant, just two minutes from this cinema!" That sort of thing.

And they were always preceded by the classic Pearl & Dean titles and theme music:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCo1Ffn9_u8&feature=related

barnhouse (#1,326)

"What is the secret of the Black Magic box?"

scrooge (#2,697)

Ah, but do you remember that decadent luxury, the Choc 99? Eat it, wipe the melted stuff off your hands, light up and enjoy the movie (or "film", actually).

LondonLee (#922)

I vividly remember – and ate quite often – the SRB:

S-R-B,
S-R-B,
The Sausage
In a Roll
In a Box
For Me!

petejayhawk (#1,249)

However offensive the underlying implications of the Pepsi "One Tribe" commercial is, it pales in comparison to the horror that is the Black-Eyed Peas.

Moff (#28)

Uh, is this really that new?

As a Gen Y-er (millennial?) too young to remember the 80s, my Pepsi consumption is largely due to my wanting to fuel my caffeine addiction without having to pay Coca-Cola for the privilege.
That said, I watched Back to The Future with my little sister last weekend, and neither of us could refrain from noticing (and pointing out) all of the product placement. And it's only gotten worse!

scrooge (#2,697)

Actually, that seems to be the point. It's the latest incarnation of an old sinner.

barnhouse (#1,326)

There's no politics at all in that old Coke ad, other than a very spongy message of proto-multiculturalism. It only claims that "the world wants a Coke," as in, it would be a nice thing to do, "to buy the world a Coke." And here is Coke suggesting that you buy the world it, which you can't beat for complete lunacy. But it's not appropriating the concept of social responsibility or political change.

Moff (#28)

Well, I just see the same basic sentiment of unity and global goodwill, and I'm not convinced that viewers absorb advertising in a fashion that really discriminates between the two ads. I also think the concepts of racial unity and peace and environmentalism have been co-opted for so long, by so many other institutions — the public education system, political parties, numerous other corporations — that I'm not sure what makes the Pepsi ad so notable. I mean, I really don't get what the much more intrusive and disquieting implications are. (As far as the group venue goes, crowds have been subjected to advertising for far longer and far more often at sporting events, which I'd argue are a heckuva lot more a communal experience than going to the movies.)

And I'm just not sure I believe world peace and the like are really anyone's fondest dreams. I think they're very vague, abstract concepts that rather blandly appeal to enormous swaths of people — which makes them ideal for co-option by advertisers. Of course people pay lip service to them; but the reason hearing "Ceremony" in an Absolut commercial was so maddening was because the enmaddened viewers thought liking Joy Division made them special. To be a Joy Division fan was something clannish, something that marked you as a person of indisputable, cultivated taste. (In fact, I'd say Joy Division fandom is the quintessential example of this kind of fandom.) To have that sense of specialness suddenly intruded upon to sell mid-shelf vodka — well, that was a real intrusion. Whereas on the other hand, by their very nature no one can feel uniquely attached to broad hopes and dreams for the betterment of humanity.

LondonLee (#922)

'Ceremony' was a New Order record (written when they were Joy Division I'll grant you)

barnhouse (#1,326)

Gee, I couldn't disagree more. Joy Division–though I have loved them for lo, these embarrassingly many years I 100% never at any point imagined that this made me "tasteful" or "special".* But I really did cringe at the Absolut commercial, and for the reasons cited. Here is this thing that's been with you kind of undisturbed all these years, shared with friends, *private*. I don't know about you but the grotesque presumption basic to modern advertising, this "knowing" All About You, is what really makes my flesh crawl.

Anyhoo re: intrusive and disquieting, look, this thing is explicitly asking us to "forget about all that evil" we're being fed (by media? by government? that is a very freaky thing to be told in a commercial) and concentrate instead on "one people." Don't you think this taps directly into the emotional and intellectual character of the 2008 presidential campaign? They even used the same musician for the freaking song. It makes use of strong currents of political feeling, and that is ultra-creepy when you are in your local liberal-enclave little theatre.

Finally, you use the word "absorb" tellingly. Nobody who sees these things is meant to discriminate at all. The less you discriminate, the better! If you just absorb the surface, let the thing touch those ideas–and to that extent, the two ads are similar, "making the world a better place" by drinking soda–you'll have the mildly good feeling they paid for you to have.

(I hope I am not the only one whose fondest dream is world peace and the like! lol.)

*if anything, it got to be so "obvious", "predictable" etc. that one would love Joy Division that you'd have to love them despite the eye-rolling. They are the Vampire Weekend of the elderly-goth set, I suppose you might say.

barnhouse (#1,326)

Whoops! that was @Moff, apols. (@LondonLee, if I have to have that argument about 'Ceremony' one more time!! haha.)

DoctorDisaster (#1,970)

I drink Coke because it tastes better? Am I the only one who still decides things this way? (But root beer wins out over either. And most of my soft drink consumption is of the "mixed with whiskey" variety, so really, my allegiance belongs to Blenheim.)

I think the specific issue here, Moff, is that advertisers have been co-opting general positive feelings forever – Santa Claus being the classic example. This is an attempt to co-opt actual community action – because, like, Millenials are sooooo into that stuff, y'know? People who are raising money to help flood victims are being press-ganged into hawking soda.

LondonLee (#922)

The thing I mostly object to now is that I paid for that movie seat in the same I pay for commercial-free HBO so I would expect that would entitle me to avoid people trying to sell me shit.

HiredGoons (#603)

I'm assuming its the theater chains selling ad space – they make like a penny on the dollar on movie tickets; its all the concession sales that make them a profit. Its not Universal shoving ads in your face, its Loews.

DoctorDisaster (#1,970)

Yeah, theaters (or I guess 'theatres,' pip pip) are desperate for cash wherever they can find it. Although to pretend that isn't the studios' fault would be ridiculous.

Do they really make it out of babies?

vespavirgin (#1,422)

I love the Of Montreal Outback commercial. Jus' sayin'.

Post a Comment