Friday, June 11th, 2010
96

Writers, Your Time Is Running Short

Sands of timeMy father, who could be both loving and dismissive in equal measure, took stock of me at fourteen and made an assessment which has haunted me ever since. It was at the beginning of my "difficult period," although I'm pretty sure everyone has a difficult period around that age. Along with the typical tiny rebellions against authority and wild swings of emotion, I had begun to do badly in school, which caused no end of concern in a family where education was highly prized and grades were the main metric of personal growth.

I should be a little more accurate: Most of the concern came from my mother, who was endlessly anxious about the prospects of her children and who observed my budding self-destructive streak with a sense of hopelessness and heartbreak. I don't think I can fully appreciate how much trauma I put her through even now; I was certainly not paying it much attention back then.

My father, on the other hand, viewed the situation with a large degree of detachment. He had by that point proven himself a success in his chosen field, and had the air of equanimity one finds in those who have achieved the goals they set early in life and are aware that they have already won the game. Things had worked out for my father. If they did not work out for me it would be unfortunate, but it wasn't something that would detract from his own victories. He could afford to be less apprehensive than my mom.

We were sitting at the dinner table one night, discussing yet another minor transgression for which I had been disciplined by school authorities. I believe my mother was crying. My father, probably in an attempt to convince her that he could help me through my struggle (but more likely because he wanted the crying to stop and figured that the best way to do that would be to take the control of the conversation), gave me a speech about the importance of appearances, of how there are things we don't want to do but have to anyway and that often it is easier to simply do those things and be on your way than to push against them, be sanctioned, and still be forced to do them just the same.

"I mean, what do you want to do with your life? How do you think you're going to get away with not following the same rules as everyone else?"

"I'm gonna be a writer," I mumbled.

This was not something I had said out loud since early childhood, when your future career changes at least once a day. But I had been thinking about it. Even with my troubles in school, writing was still an area where I flourished, perhaps because the rubrics with which its success was measured were less constrictive than those in other subjects.

"I'll write a book," I added. I was probably trying to convince myself more than I was the rest of the table.

My father eyed me coolly. He liked me, my father, I never had any doubt of that. He saw a lot of himself in me: the cruel wit, the quickness with a joke, the brooding cynicism. If I had also inherited my mother's emotional insecurities, so be it; at least his qualities were the ones that had proven dominant so far. His disappointment sprang from the fact that while I had taken on the sharper aspects of his personality, I had none of the leavening traits that made so many people genuinely care for him even though he could indeed be very vicious at times.

In any event, he looked at me, sized me up, and uttered the phrase that still burns at the back of my brain whenever I remember it.

"You'll never write a book," he said evenly. "You'll be a character in bunch of other people's books, but you're never going to write one yourself."

And there it was: loving and dismissive at the same time, and sadly accurate. As the years went on I abandoned any hopes of proving him wrong. The old man knew what he was talking about, and because of that I made the choices that brought me to the place where I am now.



Ya like that? It's fiction! Well, mostly. Anyway, I've never really had an urge to write a novel, but reading Sam Tanenhaus' argument that novelists' best work is done before 40 got me thinking: I don't have a lot of time left. If I want to write a great novel I've got to get cracking, like, now. I'm thinking of using that bit above as a starting point, but I worry that it's a little too insular and not commercial enough. Maybe I'll go with something about sexy sex vampires instead. Or international art thieves, that could be interesting!

Ah, who am I kidding? I'm just gonna keep blogging and then die. Those of you who do harbor aspirations in the direction of fiction, though, should consider yourselves warned. You'd better hurry up. If you need a little help, feel free to base one of the characters in your book on me. I pretty much write myself.

96 Comments / Post A Comment

Needs more werewolves and discussion of fancy shoes.

scroll_lock (#4,122)

Brooding cynicism and cruel wit. *le sigh*

NinetyNine (#98)

Somehow you spent two years in NOLA and forgot about Percy?

KarenUhOh (#19)

"Sam Tanenhaus is an idiot. And not the good kind."
Fyodor Dostoyesvky

katalist (#973)

"Right on."
-George Eliot

Matt (#26)

"This one is called 'Prove It All Night,' ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR…"

This inspired me to finally get cracking on that Balk and Choire slash fiction.

Tuna Surprise (#573)

Will it be told from the point of view of Cat?

HiredGoons (#603)

the part where they go to the grocery store takes up six chapters.

The Coinstar fiasco needs an entire chapter alone, and you cannot tell me different.

Alex I'm not sure how serious this post is, but the excerpt above is awesome. At the risk of sounding like a suck-up, I can honestly say that if the scene above were really the opening of a book, I couldn't wait to read the rest of it.

So prove that DISMISSIVE FICTIONAL FATHER wrong!! Write that book!

crookedE (#1,817)

I agree! Go for it, Balk. I can't wait until I can describe other people's work as "Balkian".

ProfessorBen (#1,254)

cocky!

What if it's a fucking cook book?

hockeymom (#143)

I think that your father gave you a compliment.
A lot of people can be organized and persistent enough to write a book.
Some of those books are even really good!
Very few people are interesting enough, compelling enough to be a character in a book.
It may not get you rich, but it is a gift. And it probably matters to more people than you think.

I think he said the scene is fictional? Which would mean his father never said that.

Of course, I may be wrong and/or missing one or two layers or irony here. Wouldn't be the first time!

hockeymom (#143)

I just assumed he was lying.

Yes, that would be one of those "layers of irony" I was referring to. You may be right.

doubled277 (#2,783)

You can't lie on a blog. There are rules.

musicmope (#428)

Fathers of writers don't give compliments. To their sons, anyway.

Baboleen (#1,430)

If you were a character in a book, other than yourself, who would you be?

HiredGoons (#603)

Eeyore.

Baboleen (#1,430)

I'm smiling. As a kid, Mary Francis Nolan.

awlsome (#706)

I really really liked this.

SidAndFinancy (#4,328)

I'd rather hang out with Cassady than Kerouac, anyway.

saythatscool (#101)

@S&F: Said Allen Ginsberg. Who incidentally, tried to molest me once too!

SidAndFinancy (#4,328)

Too? Meaning as well as me?

Sat next to Gins at the bar at the West End once. He ordered burgundy. (Me, I hit the harder stuff.)

saythatscool (#101)

Ha! No, I actually meant Cassady. BTW, it's good to see you here old chum.

BadUncle (#153)

Paul Bartel stared at my ass, once.

Gregory Corso once rubbed up against me in a crowded subway car.

saythatscool (#101)

Gregory Corso put his hand on my thigh and I quickly and uncomfortably moved away.

saythatscool (#101)

Hip! You too?

SidAndFinancy (#4,328)

William S. Burroughs told me he needed a fix … of ME!

STC: OMG! I was thinking maybe I was imagining things about Gregory, but maybe not …

Anyway, he's dead now. And we have our therapists to help us.

saythatscool (#101)

Corso was a letch. He wanted some of that white head of yours an my muppet one. No doubt!

BadUncle (#153)

I saw the best thighs of my generation
Touched by a madman, squeezing hysterical naked.
Mostly naked.

Screen Name (#2,416)

"Unsurprisingly, in youth-obsessed America, writers have often done their best work early."
- Sam Tanenhaus

This qualitative statement pretends to be supported by a quantitative analysis but in the end simply proves the point the late Vladimir Arnold consistently made about what happens to a society once it descends into innumerate savagery.

That said, nice piece Balk.

saythatscool (#101)

Heh! You said "piece."

deepomega (#1,720)

Also, all artists die unappreciated and penniless.

SidAndFinancy (#4,328)

November 30, 1835: Samuel Clemens born

February 18, 1885: Adventures of Huckleberry Finn published

HiredGoons (#603)

I can't wait for the autobiography. Can't. Wait.

HelloTitty (#830)

I'm probably the only one here who had never heard of Sam Tanenhaus, but what do you know! A bit of Googleing reveals that he's the brother of my former faculty advisor, favorite professor, and lab boss at UofR Mike Tanenhaus who once loaned me $100 so that I could buy my textbooks. Super nice guy.

Fictional or not, has "the beginning of [your] 'difficult period'" ever ended?

KarenUhOh (#19)

See, where you want to go with this intro is, you have the boy [Josef B.] go ahead and write his darn novel, right then and there when he's 14, but since he's just some doofus kid he doesn't know where or how to get a novel published, so he sticks the MS under the bed with his Dad's old copies of Penthouse, which Dad knows JB keeps there, too, so he finds his son's book while searching for the Pet of the Year 1974 Issue, and sends son's novel off to a tony NYC publishing haus under his own name instead, and they love it because it's an arch acidwashed assessment of a teen miasma in which Adults Just Don't Get It, Do They, What It Means To Be 14 w/ Adults Just Not Getting It, so tony NYC P-haus publishes the darn thing, and Dad becomes an international sensation, he's got blondes and Cadillacs hanging off every appendage, and he ditches wife and kids because who the heck has time anymore for that when you've got Eldorados weighing down your elbows, and he goes to Hollywood where he appears on Johnny Carson, and not even in the last five minutes, either, and he dates Real Stars like Joan Van Ark, while Joe B. sits on the sidelines at home in his stupid bedroom in his BVDs, watching all this, and it gets him all hot and bittered because, after all, that's his darn book his Dad's out there pimping with Joan Van Ark, and did she change her hair color again??, and so he schemes up how he can get back at Pop for his duplicity, and he decides the really Gotcha way to do it is to write another darn novel, about how Adults They Think Like They Can Steal Their Children's Youth Away From Them, But They Got Another Think Coming, and he spends ten years writing it and editing it and meticulously poring and paring and biting his fingernails until it's down to just 250 perfectly chosen words, and, while all this poring and paring and biting is happening, he plum forgets to date any real human beings throughout his entire 20's, or have any semblance of an Actual Real Life, because he's way too busy with this new darn novel that Settles All Scores, but, in the end, he has no idea where or how to publish a novel, so instead Josef B. throws up his nail-bitten hands and buys a twelve-pack of Wisconsin Club and lies on his couch watching re-runs of Mr. Belvedere, dreaming of what Might Have Damn Well Was Supposed To Be, and cursing his darn Dad for stealing his 1974 Pet of the Year Issue.

Abe Sauer (#148)

I see Paul Giamatti leading with Zoey D as the love interest.

laurel (#4,035)

[tip-toes away with "all hot and bittered" hidden under her arm]

HiredGoons (#603)

Now I know how Joan Van Ark felt.

"A triumphant masterpiece."

That 1974 PotY issue was a cut above.

musicmope (#428)

Isn't this the plot of the new film by the Napoleon Dynamite guy?

mathnet (#27)

What was your fictional sister doing?

jennie (#25)

i think it's an honorable thing to keep blogging and then die.

And why would anyone want to write a novel? What is this, 1868?

City_Dater (#2,500)

Sam Tanenhaus makes a completely crap non-argument, contradicting himself halfway through and then doubling back to his lame thesis statement, though if it keeps some of the people on that damn New Yorker list from writing another word once they hit 40, it won't be a bad thing.

You should write your novel and if you don't finish it until you're over 40, you're going to be in some truly awesome company. Besides, you'll need years to convince your parents it isn't *really* about them.

La Cieca (#1,110)

The Tanenhaus Argument obviously can only be applied to writers who were writing a lot and getting published before the age of 40, and the comparison would seem to be between the work they do before 40 and after 40. (For people who don't produce much before they're 40, there's no basis of comparison between their "young" and "old" work.)

All that may mean is that writers who have success (or at least who are prolific) when they're young write best about young people stuff. They get older and they can't write about the stuff older people think about.

It's also possible, not sure how likely, that people who do write good books when they're young end up being pressured to write and write and write, which means they stuff they churn out when they're older isn't as well crafted. And of course once a writer is known, everything he publishes is under a microscope.

Finally, reviewers and readers are probably a lot more forgiving of young writers' faults than they are of more established writers'.

It also seems, in a number of cases, that writers who have big hits while young are much, much less carefully edited later. Their work suffers for that lack of editing in big ways. (Actually, lots of writers of any age who have big hits seem to be edited less stringently later, to no good ends.)

i like to describe this phenomenon with the phrase "fake it once you've made it."

kneetoe (#1,881)

The easiest way to get around that generalization is to write your first book after age 40.

lurkystars (#3,581)

You read my mind. I'm waiting for 40. Then all my pent-up creativity and talent will explode into at least THREE books!

barnhouse (#1,326)

I wonder if he really meant it, or if he was just trying to just dare you. At the risk of being presumptuous (apols. in advance) I can imagine an older version of you doing that.

It's all wrong about the young fictionalists. Or at least, very few novels written by under-40s mean a thing to me. Waugh, David Foster Wallace, very few others. Dostoevsky, Fielding … so many, many guys who did their greatest work later in life. And (again) I must strongly recommend Jane Gardam's Old Filth; you'd love that book, I reckon. It came out when she was 76.

All that being said, I would like to read all of the books you propose to write, and in this order: (1) art thieves (2) sexy sex vampires (3) bildungsroman.

skybarn (#5,465)

Published in 1939, when Raymond Chandler was 50, this is the first of the Philip Marlowe novels.

Abe Sauer (#148)

But writing the novel isn't the point is it? You write the novel (that pays no money) under 40 so that you can maximize the number of working years to teach writing and write magazine and newspaper articles ABOUT writers and writing (that pay money). right?

SidAndFinancy (#4,328)

Movie rights. That's where the money is.

missdelite (#625)

Write.

missdelite (#625)

@S&F: Write again.

Novels get buried 'neath stacks of Harry Potters and Twilight. Screen and stage plays have a better shot at a wider audience, IMO. Bonus points if you produce it yourself and create enough buzz to attract media attention.

Clip Arthur (#2,024)

You know how many books out there are really just expanded failed pitches for TV shows or movies? A lot of them! I know of very few authors in NYC who are in it just to get a tome published.

Thus there are indeed a lot of books out there by folks 40 and younger. And they mostly horrible and self-indulgent.

La Cieca (#1,110)

Marry an heiress and then write twee wine reviews.

City_Dater (#2,500)

@missdelite:

Oh yeah, because contemporary American playwrights (not to mention unknown quantity screenwriters) have such luck getting produced and reaching a wide audience. Oh, that gigantic crowd of American theatergoers!

Better to write a novel that Oprah (and/or the ideal teenage girl reader) adores that someone thinks will make a good movie. Look at that Traveling Pants bitch.

Also, most options are never exercised. Writers get paid for the *option* to make the film. The vast majority never get produced.

missdelite (#625)

@C_D: It's hard to guage the success rate of novel vs. screenplay vs. stage play. For every book La Oprah promotes, an indie film blows up from out of nowhere (She's Gotta Have it, Juno, Paranormal Activity, Blairwitch Project). I still maintain that more people will see a movie than read a book – maybe it's a generational thing? Anyway, Oprah's leaving that game soon, so what's a poor novelist to do?

Moral of the story: Don't write for accolades or attention.

Aside: Over 20 years ago, my Dad wrote a critically-acclaimed play that was sold out every night, well into its extended run. The second play was slaughtered in the local media and cancelled before the end of its first run. It made him bitter, and even though he still writes and stages his own works, he doesn't invite the press. Of course, this means hardly anyone attends these shows. Yeah, he's a stubborn old goat.

Moral of this story? If you're gonna write, grow a thick skin fer chrissakes.

I think Balk (or excuse me, "the character") and I have the same father.

Art Yucko (#1,321)

I was convinced, for maybe 30 seconds, that "Balk" and I were the same person from parallel universes.
-Camera Shy, check (although I'm a cameraman, so make of that what you will.)
-Jarringly deep baritone voice, check.
- <3 Alcoholic beverages, check.
- Hardassed, successful-at-what-he-does, critical Dad, check!

cuiveen (#370)

Um, Ursula K. Le Guin anyone?

My screenwriting teacher said that it was largely useless to write a screenplay under the age of 40. Because you hadn't lived and experienced enough to write anything worthwhile.

I tend to agree. If only because I'm 40 now.

Abe Sauer (#148)

ha ha ha. That's what all screenwriters teachers say because they'll gladly take the money to teach a new crop BUT THEY DON'T WANT MORE COMPETITION.

Well, you can't TEACH SATC2. That's catching lightning in a bottle!

Abe Sauer (#148)

TRUE! Those who think SATC2 was a horrible script should read some scripts from a screenwriting program and imagine them actually made into films. (MINE INCLUDED). There are no words.

Many moons ago I worked for a lit agent and had to read all the screenplay submissions from writers looking for representation. I now find it hard to read scripts that have actually seen the light of a projection booth much less those of dewy eyed hopefuls enrolled in a screenwriting program.

HiredGoons (#603)

as the sufferer of many pitch sessions, and writing a screenplay while 26 I can only *sigh!

It's *this* meets *this* pretty much sums everything up.

Abe Sauer (#148)

I wonder: When it's said that all good novelists work is done before 40 does it mean that all writers who turn out to be good novelists had the seeds of their novel sewn before 40? Because, my understanding, is that most good novels germinated for a long time in the minds of their writers. The writer who puts out a great novel in his or her 50s maybe has been thinking about it for 20 years. This seems to argue that the novel only exists after it has been written and reviewed and aged.

But what you lack in youth, you make up for in poverty and alcoholism.

doubled277 (#2,783)

This I think sums it all up.

jetztinberlin (#392)

Oh gah, I wish it didn't but it does.

Alex Balk (#4)

That's gonna keep me drunk and crying throughout the weekend. Thanks!

doubled277 (#2,783)

You were going to be drunk and crying anyway. At least, I know I was.

Miles Klee (#3,657)

not sure whether i'd rather see a drunk cry-off or a weepy drink-off

MatthewGallaway (#1,239)

Although Tanenhaus tries to use Proust in support of his argument, the fact remains that Proust didn't publish Swann's Way until he was 42. End of story. Rock on, olds!

barnhouse (#1,326)

YAY.

HiredGoons (#603)

God, the footnotes must read like a 15 year old girl's diary.

This scene exactly could have been any week of my life from age 13 to 17. Except for the part where your dad told you you'd never write a book. What a dick. Read The Artist's Way. She tells you how to exorcise your childhood critic demons.

ScottRaphael (#5,406)

I started writing a novel after I lost my job in 2008. 105 pages in and I just abandoned it on a string of internships and freelance jobs in a never-ending quest for a salaried sellout. I ONLY HAVE 13 GOOD YEARS LEFT IN ME!

x^n (#5,476)

More sexy vampires. When I take over the world I'm going to distill TV and movies into fetishes and broadcast each one of them on its own channel 24/7. That will fix everything.

RonMwangaguhung (#3,697)

"keep blogging and then die" is what writers do nowadays. And drink. So your covered. Writing novels and stuff is so post-war generation.

HiredGoons (#603)

we are the 'perpetual war' generation, right?

Post a Comment