Don't believe a dude with a wide face, says Science. "Here's how the researchers figure the link between facial width and trustworthiness might work: During male adolescence, a surge in testosterone prompts bone growth not only in the spine and limbs, but also in the face. Therefore, a wide face may be a sign of an overall bigger man, one who can get away with being more aggressive and less cooperative. Slighter men might act in a more civilized, and trustworthy, way – out of necessity."

This post should be illustrated with a photo of Chuck Bass.
What is it with the Ed Westwick hate today? Dude's purty!
I don't think it's a bad thing! Westwick's face is both beautiful AND wide!
Bad news for the brachycephalic. Or the doliocephalic? Or is that good news? Science! So many facts, so few answers!
To say nothing of a wide stance.
That's why I prefer my men to be delicately Byronic.
The idea is preposterous, but it reminds me of Churchill's opinion of John Foster Dulles: "I distrust his great slab of a face."
how wide equals wide?
Why can't we just stay with not trusting the blacks?