Quantcast
 

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

18

We Have Many Questions About The "Certain" Coming Terror

BETTER LIKE THIS????So at the end of the day yesterday, CIA honcho Leon Panetta, and Dennis C. Blair, the director of national intelligence, told the Senate Intelligence Committee that al Qaeda was basically ready to roll. Or are they? Let's take a look at what they said, so that we can be more and or less frightened.

Panetta: "The biggest threat is not so much that we face an attack like 9/11. It is that al Qaeda is adapting its methods in ways that oftentimes make it difficult to detect."

1. "Is not so much." So it is "some much"?

2. What exactly is "like" 9/11?

3. What are these methods?

4. Oftentimes?

And, from their report, however: "First, we have been warning since 9/11 that al-Qa'ida, al-Qa'ida-associated groups, and al- Qa'ida inspired terrorists remain committed to striking the United States and US interests. What is different is that we have names and faces to go with that warning."

1. So... it's difficult to detect? But now you have names and faces?

And also, how does this go with the AP report? They say: "The terrorist organization is deploying operatives to the United States to carry out new attacks from inside the country, including 'clean' recruits with a negligible trail of terrorist contacts, CIA Director Leon Panetta said."

1. So... you do not have names and faces.

Blair: "Al Qaeda maintains its intent to attack the homeland-preferably with a large-scale operation that would cause mass casualties, harm the U.S. economy or both."

1. So, yes, a large-scale operation then? Not "not so much"?

2. I like the idea of casting al Qaeda as an organization with "preferences." It's like they have a white board and some really boring meetings. "Well, we'd prefer to cripple the U.S. economy this year, but we'll also think outside the box on just seriously annoying a large group of people."

From the report: "Targets that have been the focus of more than one al-Qa'ida plot include aviation, financial institutions in New York City, and government targets in Washington, D.C. Other targets al- Qa'ida has considered include the Metro system in Washington D.C., bridges, gas infrastructure, reservoirs, residential complexes, and public venues for large gatherings."

1. SUPERBOWL????

Blair: "Malicious cyberactivity is occurring on an unprecedented scale with extraordinary sophistication." And: something-something "cyber-Pearl Harbor."

1. ???

2. You mean like in Live Free or Die Hard???

Looks like the answer is, at least in part, to bypass the quote cherry-picking media, and learn for yourself. Here is their report. [PDF file]

18 Comments / Post A Comment

KarenUhOh
KarenUhOh (#19)

Oh, you're aiming way, way low. They're going after Twitter.

rj77
rj77 (#210)

Bin Laden keeps bugging me to nominate him for a Shorty Award. And, I'm like, dude, maybe you should get out of your damn cave for a while #tellitlikeitis

brent_cox
brent_cox (#40)

Bin Laden just wants to be the Mayor of Afghanistan on Foursquare.

Kataphraktos
Kataphraktos (#226)

dislikes this.

jolie
jolie (#16)

Cyber-Pearl Harbor = Attacking The Awl's Super Bowl liveblog thusly "seriously annoying a large group of people" which is my way of asking again AGAIN for a The Awl Super Bowl liveblog.

oudemia
oudemia (#177)

So it's like Two Minute Warning, but with people being wrong on the internet?

cherrispryte
cherrispryte (#444)

I second this request.

Ribs
Ribs (#2,690)

Al-Queda UPS whiteboard guy is basically already planning attacks: http://bit.ly/cvPWsD
With a couple of deft strokes he unexpectedly turns the number eleven into a marker-sketch of the Twin Towers.

DoctorDisaster
DoctorDisaster (#1,970)

Shorter Panetta/Blair: Be scared! Give us money!

KenWheaton
KenWheaton (#401)

I'm thinking this is the administration's attempt to give cover as it backtracks on holding KSM show trials in lower Manhattan. Also, with the midterm coming up, they want to prove they can monger fear as good as those damn Republicans!

hunter.blatherer
hunter.blatherer (#3,308)

It IS an interesting strategy*. The only way it can fail if there actually is an attack. But if there isn't one, we have to be thankful that the National Security State kept us safe.

*-not really

HiredGoons
HiredGoons (#603)

So he's saying Al Qaeda was behind the housing bubble!?

SemperBufo
SemperBufo (#1,849)

Homeland. Why don't they just go ahead and call it the Fatherland?

Matt
Matt (#26)

I would prefer they rip off Die Hard With a Vengeance? I would like someone to call me with instructions! I am lonely.

DorothyMantooth

Yes! More math problems, plz!

Dickdogfood
Dickdogfood (#650)

Rock critic and security duder George Smith here runs down just how ancient the "electronic Pearl Harbor" cliché is: http://www.dickdestiny.com/blog/2010/01/electronic-pearl-harbor-games-until.html

Aatom
Aatom (#74)

Um, I think the cyber-attack is underway, because there are about a billion tiny words below this text box about Phentermine? Is this an ad campaign or bio/cyber-warfare?

Antonia Capet
Antonia Capet (#2,372)

Also I fail to see the point of the announcement? Is it to cover the CIA's ass if something happens? In the sense that, "we knew SOMETHING would happen"? But at the same time they are desirous of various outs in case they predicted it wrong? Because this is pretty much every possibility possible?

Post a Comment

You must be logged-in to post a comment.

Login To Your Account