Quantcast
 

Thursday, February 18, 2010

20

Now You're Cooking With Cancer!

Shiny, classy cancer-causerOkay, what's going to give you cancer today? Let's go with cooking!

The International Agency for Research on Cancer has also classified cooking fumes as "probably carcinogenic". Now researchers from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim have compared gas and electric cooking methods, and found that gas produces higher levels of the cancer-causing fumes.

The authors, whose study is published in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine, point out that the levels of the chemicals and particulates found in their study were below accepted occupational safety thresholds. But they add that cooking fumes contain other harmful components for which there is no safety threshold, as yet, and which appear to be higher with gas cooking. "Exposure to cooking fumes should be reduced as much as possible," they say.
What kind of cancers might cooking with gas give you? Lung, bladder, and cervix, says Science! Your risk of such is likely to rise if you smoke while you cook, which, let's face it, is the only way to really get creative over the stove. Anyway, all you raw food faddists out there get to be extra-smug today, if you can muster up the energy, which you probably can't. The rest of you? You're all gonna die.

20 Comments / Post A Comment

dado
dado (#102)

Luckily I give myself a coffee enema while I saute brussel sprouts, so it's a wash.

Maura Johnston

this study brought to you by seamlessweb?

TerseNursePornstein

It is exhausting, this always being ahead of the curve for you people.

brianvan
brianvan (#149)

"harmful components for which there is no safety threshold"

I'm thinking steam or water here. Have you ever had too much water? Like Natalie Wood?

Anyway, this confirms that I can still eat as much bacon as I want, as long as the maid cooks it for me in the other room.

La Cieca
La Cieca (#1,110)

So is it deadlier or less deadly if you have tricked your oven into going into cleaning mode so you can cook a pizza?

WindowSeat
WindowSeat (#180)

Raw Foodists create dangerous levels of gas.

widestanceromance

I guess lighting cigarettes from the stove whilst cooking is bad, too (who needs eyebrows?).

Lionel Mandrake

I have to say, there are very things I miss about smoking, but as gross as it is, smoking while cooking (accompanied by a glass or three of wine) is one I miss the most. Especially lighting the cig from burner you've got that fine ribeye steak sauteing in.

HiredGoons
HiredGoons (#603)

Just fry everything, and you'll be fine.

NotAndersonCooper

Is there a fry app for the ipad? It seems like a nice cooking surface.

WindowSeat
WindowSeat (#180)

Sous vide FTW

HiredGoons
HiredGoons (#603)

@WindowSeat: cooking condoms can't be far behind.

cherrispryte
cherrispryte (#444)

New idea: can we just have a list of things that DON'T give you cancer?

RamonaRanchera

Please note, Balk, that the daily mail - your fave UK rag - gives the example of a test in this study that cooked a steak on the stovetop for 15 minutes as a baseline.

WHO THE FUCK COOKS A STEAK FOR 15 MINUTES?!!

Alex Balk
Alex Balk (#4)

British people, because it's more satisfying to stab after.

deepomega
deepomega (#1,720)

A steak cooked for 15 minutes should feel like the jaw of a drunk, perfect for practicing your glassing technique.

RamonaRanchera

That's why they cook steaks for 25 minutes in Glasgow.

Lionel Mandrake

I've known more than a few Brits who eat their steak...well done (gag). They have such great beef over there too. It's just wrong.

Kevin
Kevin (#2,559)

All this living of life, it's killing me.

Post a Comment

You must be logged-in to post a comment.

Login To Your Account