The self-important OCD-riddled semi-sociopath director James Cameron is, unfortunately, insanely correct in this case, whether or not this Twitter account is really his, which I kind of don't think it is.
Friday, December 11, 2009
13
James Fakeing Cameron.
Even if it isn't him, he's almost certainly thinking this.
Whoever says doing ANY retrospective on the decade before late 2010 is insanely correct. The decade doesn't end until 12/31/10. But I guess all hope for this is lost since the NYTimes capitulated to popular opinion re: 2000 vs. 2001 being the first year of the new millenium.
Oh yeah, we've all given up on that shit. Sorry! I know, the year zero, etc etc. But we've all moved on.
Also I technically think that the next decade won't start till 2012? Like how the 60s didn't start till 63? HISTORY WILL PROVE ME RIGHT.
nothing is starting in 2012. NOTHING
Just like how the millennium didn't really start until September of 2001, when a small group of fanatics launched an all-out assault on New York City, and the world. Is This It changed everything.
"is disingenuous hackery" would be better.
Or just "tacky".
That definitely sounds like him. I've found in life that a person's bravado about their art is directly disproportionate with its quality. But maybe he's an exception (with this movie, not that shit bomb Titanic.)
Lindsay is PRECISELY right on this.
Well, if anyone knows anything about hackery...
If he wants to think he was the best thing about this decade, and be happy about that, then more power to him.
Whether or not it's him, and it's too dead-on to really be him, you're investing an awful lot in proclaiming this film to be a masterpiece, both here and on Gawker.
Hope Jimbo doesn't let you (and all of us) down, tho' I won't be watching.