Quantcast
 

Thursday, December 10, 2009

28

Intention of Slideshows, Charticles Defeated by Zealous Tagging!

VIEW THISI wanted to know, for reasons that escaped me mere moments later, what Details might possibly have chosen for their list of "The 25 Greatest Gen X Books of All Time." (I think it was because the "of all time" part amused me.) Unfortunately for all of us, when I clicked through from a friend's Twitter, I found their list was horrifically organized as one-book-per-page slideshow. (The "show" of those slides consisted, of course, of pictures of the book covers.) Fortunately, their SEO desires undid them, to my benefit.

THANKS TAGS

Phew! Right there on page one. No need to click through. And no need to endure their pop-up ads, urging me to subscribe!

28 Comments / Post A Comment

hockeymom
hockeymom (#143)

Gawker does this crap, too.
Dislike, very much.

Bettytron
Bettytron (#575)

The trick on Gawker is to delete the /gallery/ from the end of the URL. BAM, all on one page, captions intact.

hockeymom
hockeymom (#143)

THANK you!

Choire Sicha

SERVICEY!!!

hazmathilda
hazmathilda (#839)

This changes everything! (er, ish)

Rod T
Rod T (#33)

Pro-user!

metoometoo
metoometoo (#230)

Wow, I am really excited about this piece of information.

KarenUhOh
KarenUhOh (#19)

A Million Little Tags

hockeymom
hockeymom (#143)

...but "We Wish to Inform You That Tomorrow We Will Be Killed With Our Families" is an amazing book and should be read.

So +1 to Details for that.

avec_serif
avec_serif (#1,874)

a definitive Gen X book, to be sure.

jolie
jolie (#16)

Esquire does this too. With lists of 75 items. MADDENING.

garge
garge (#736)

The hundred-tiny-thumbnail thing they do kills me.

I was also disappointed by the impenetrable LA Times 2009 death slide show from yesterday; perhaps the "list" misnomer is what makes it offensive, implying information that can be quickly absorbed.

beingiseasy
beingiseasy (#1,735)

totally agree. I wanted to see a police blotter-type thing going on. cause of death, major accomplishments, possible nefarious dealings...and instead I got nothing but a barbed wire fence of photos haphazardly arranged.

MisterHippity

The plan is to get 75 page views from each person, instead of just one.

That assumes each person will click-and-load all 75 items, of course. Perhaps there are more people out than we realize who have that much time on their hands?

jolie
jolie (#16)

Well thank God you're here to explain to me how the Internet works.

jolie
jolie (#16)

Close your i tags, jolie, this isn't Jamaica.

hockeymom
hockeymom (#143)

OT...Editor and Publisher is shutting down. The parade of media death continues.

oudemia
oudemia (#177)

I guess if there are no longer editors and publishers. Oof.

brent_cox
brent_cox (#40)

They were going to keep the mag running but change the title to "and" but then decided against it.

LondonLee
LondonLee (#922)

Next year it will be relaunched as "Blogger and Mom"

tralafel
tralafel (#1,221)

I'm somewhat surprised to see Motherless Brooklyn on there.

mathnet
mathnet (#27)

Are you kidding? I love that book!

Rod T
Rod T (#33)

Thank you for forcing me to look this up.

Rod T
Rod T (#33)

American Psycho? No. Not at all.

Matt
Matt (#26)

I would like to see the quadratic formula they used to determine "Generation X." (Of all time.)

LondonLee
LondonLee (#922)

So the only thing connecting these books is that they were written on a computer not a typewriter? Which sort of begs the question, how do they know?

blatanville
blatanville (#860)

asking the obviousA GenX list, and no Douglas Coupland? Wha?

joeclark
joeclark (#651)

I gather this is an implicit admission that the Awl has ceased its previous paginating ways? We want you to run a good Web site, not a shitty one like Details’s. Go, Awl, and Next page â†' no more.

Post a Comment

You must be logged-in to post a comment.

Login To Your Account