December 22, 2009

Doree Returns (To Gawker)

by Balk posted @8:41 PM


OMG! Following in the footsteps of her mentor, Doree Shafrir—who we all love—is RETURNING TO GAWKER. Hopefully she will bring back the dildo with her!

UPDATE: OOH! And also Richard Lawson! It's like nostalgia or something! Something GOOD!

ALSO: It should be made clear that Doree is only returning as a two-day-a-week contributor. A two-day-a-week contributor, okay? It is apparently very important that we clarify: Doree Shafrir back at Gawker as a two-day-a-week contributor. We hear those days are Thursday and Friday, but whatever days they are, it will only be two of them.

 
Tags
Share
DiggThis
 

118 Comments / Post a new comment

  1. Hez [#147]

    It's because my holiday cards to the Awl office are so late, isn't it?

    GAH! What do internet people I've never met WANT?!?

    • sez_t [#2722]

      Hez enough is enough – your desperate attention-seeking and self promotion only got you so far at Gawker. The grudge you bear against the editors who tried to curtail it is embarrassing to witness. Let it go girl, you're just a regular commenter on a blog, not the whip-smart superstar you see in the mirror. Accept reality, please.

  2. ADRIAN [#1676]

    hopefully she brings some Latkes.

  3. Setec Astrology [#324]

    Can we still have Doree on Wednesdays and every other weekend? Please?

  4. esquared [#888]

    Happy Happy Joy Joy. Hope her stint lasts longer this time.

  5. Abe Sauer [#148]

    That link is like performance art now with the new Gawker format. Read to the end:

    "Contact information for this author is not available."

  6. raincoaster [#628]

    This is brilliant news for Gawker readers; hope it's also brilliant news and not just "well, if I close my eyes and think of the pageviews" for Doree. But then, she's never been a doormat.

  7. esquared [#888]

    One wonders why they left (voluntary or otherwise) in the first place.

    Now, if only Sheila also returns.

  8. NinetyNine [#98]

    Does this mean all the my clients that left since 2007 are coming back?

  9. rod_townsend [#33]

    This all begets the question: So who's out?

  10. mathnet [#27]

    (We are going to need an updated seating chart.)

  11. mathnet [#27]

    And you know what? I'm psychic because I fucking woke up and kept hearing "I learned it by watching you" in my head over and over and over again until I got distracted in the shower by the (still! just like yesterday!) empty bath gel container.

    The connection to Doree and Richard's return is so obvious now that I can't believe I couldn't put it together this morning.

  12. formerly it takes a lot etc. [#87]

    scaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscar
    scaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscar
    scaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscar
    scaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscar
    scaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscaryscar

  13. Doree [#5]

    Oh hello! I would have chimed in earlier but I was trapped at a showing of Avatar.

    Anyway. Yes, I am returning to Gawker the first week of January. But unlike Richard I'm not going back full-time. I'll be there two days a week, most likely Thursdays and Fridays. Send tips!!!!!!!!!

  14. mathnet [#27]

    Anybody know my Gawker password?

  15. Matt Cherette [#2720]

    Breaking my Awl comment cherry to say that I'm stoked about this.

  16. Vulpes [#946]

    Hooray! But a GIRL on Gawker?!? Unpossible!

    Seriously, though, as someone who, due to boring work, has continued to read Gawker through some recent… rough patches (though I think it's a bit better now), this will literally make my day. And, not to be mean (just kidding), having Richard back instead of Moylen would be heaven. I feel sorry for him, because I think he's finally starting to be able to have something of his own voice now, but he really was just brought on to be Richard's Cousin Oliver (irony!), and it was a pale, pale reflection. I just hope Denton lets Richard run with the even longer, more outre recapping he's been doing on TV.com, because that shit is gold.

    P.S. Ahem!

  17. Tom McGeveran [#23]

    Nice work Doree! Now that I have no allegiances, all my tipz is going to you.

  18. mathnet [#27]

    OMG annnnnnnnnnnd I have a new nephew as of NOW! REAL-SOLSTICE MIRACLE PAGAN BITCHEZ

  19. clarencerosario [#134]

    And, of course, Gawker Media sites (Deadspin and Gawker) are down right now in celebration.

  20. BoHan [#29]

    So what trend has Denton snorted now? Newser boring him? I got it! He's fucking drank the Allison Mooney Kool-aid. Ok now I can ignore them until the next twitch.

  21. andj [#1074]

    Something I'd like to know: why do so many writers leave Gawker and then come back? Is it one of those places that seems awful until you realize you have no better options? Or maybe it's something else, something more interesting? Inquiring minds want to know…

  22. andj [#1074]

    Also, I checked the link about Gawker employees v. contractors. After taking income tax law, I think I could offer some non-expert advice to contractors about deductions (from their Canadian income taxes)!

  23. jolie [#16]

    There isn't enough EXCITED CLAPPING!!! in the world…

    (But this needs to be said: CHOIRE DON'T YOU GO GETTING ANY IDEAS. Balk, I'll be over later with some bungee cords to help you strap him to that TableDesk. Because God knows you don't know how to use a damn bungee cord, mutter mutter.)

  24. KarenUhOh [#19]

    Well, shits and wiggles.

    Congratulations, you two.

    Beware the Darkside, and, you know, all that, but–take it back. Take Back Gawker for the Real Gawkeria.

    You be nice to Richard, Mr. D. I know where you live.

  25. AndHereComeThePretzels [#2724]

    Lawson's recaps are the only acceptable reason for watching MTV programming. Well, that and the occasional bare boob on True Life.

  26. yellojkt [#187]

    This reminds me of the time that Foxy Brown deleted Defamer from my bookmarks list.

  27. garge [#736]

    This is wonderful news for everyone except my overburdened Google Reader. L'chaim!

  28. HiredGoons [#603]

    Richard Lawson owes me a drink that we'll both actually remember.

  29. josh_speed [#97]

    YAY! Congrats Doree and Richard!!! I too cannot remember my Gawker password, it's been that long. You need a scorecard to follow the players in this saga, I am telling you.

  30. RickVigorous [#214]

    Thank God, reading the comments on Richard's tv.com pieces was painful. And Doree, please do your best to clean up the mess, thx.

  31. formerly it takes a lot etc. [#87]

    Will Jack Ketch come back, too? Cuz I can never tell if I've been executed or there's just another software foul-up.

  32. sargasm [#104]

    Congratulations to both! I wondered what was making Richard too verklempt to do his Jersey Shore recap justice. Happy news!

  33. fek [#93]

    Also, hello! I know it's great and cool and awesome to regard Gawker with different stripes of contempt – for whatever reason everyone has, and like snowflakes, many of them are unique! – but it'd be disingenuous to write off the hard work some of the people over there are doing (far from what I do, which is a sad 36 hour song-and-dance cross-section where dick jokes about Andrew Sullivan and Lady Gaga meet in the middle).

    But John digs deep and finds great stuff. Hamilton's a workhorse. Alex's editorials are political commentary gone Sniper-Shoot the Freak. Brian worked way harder than any of you have any idea to get where he is, and he continues to produce incredibly creative stuff. Adrian Chen is now the funniest person Gawker's had since, well, Richard left, and Ravi Somaiya – who came from the NYT City Room – is, for a guy working in the middle of the night with fairly limited resources, one hell of a reporter. This goes without mentioning the other sites. Hello: AJ. Etc. I could go on.

    So! Label the institution or the machine or whatever the fuck you want, but at least give credit to the work that goes into it. It's not an easy job, but writers are writing, and they're trying to give it due diligence, and I think, often, they do it very well. That's all.

    • BoHan [#29]

      Fek don't know you from Adam but you do seem to have a personality that comes across in your work. And it's fun, in the same way that Spiers, Choire, Coen, Emily And Balk and many others made Gawker fun and gave it a sense of who they were. They became your imaginary best friends. What little I see of it now appears to be an endless stream of Jersey Shore linkbait, interspersed with rehashed NyTimes links that I prefer to read there. And then there's Gabriel Snyder telling everyone how fucking awesome Gawker is and people like this Moylan person screaming at the gays cuz they just don't understand him. I really can't tell one of you from another. It all just runs together but in sum it exudes this sort of fuck you world attitude that only works for an overprivileged coddled to the manor born Williamsburg prick. I don't doubt you all work hard but that doesn't mean the world has to love your product.

      • hihowareyou [#2712]

        Moylan deserves/d to defend himself and gets "screamed" at more than anyone would like to admit. It's hard filling a cult figure's shoes but I think he's more capable and has been given almost no credit. Take A.Belonsky, I have absolutely no idea what happened behind the scenes but commenters had their pitchforks out for him and now he's gone. Were either of these men unqualified? No. Are Gawker commenter raging shreiking self involved assholes?* Yes. I would never want to go under that microscope of Gawker as either a writer or a subject. Although it's probably formed a lot of thick skins. That being said, I hate to dish too much about G because I love the Awl. Thank you The Awl, Happy Holidays!

        *I'm one.

      • MisterHippity [#46]

        Hey hey hey I will hear no further dissing of my man Brian Moylan.

        His is good and funny writer and a great guy. The end.

    • Choire [#2]

      It's very hard thing to do, to write things you don't like writing, or about things you don't care about, and also to work to a quota.

      (Of course it's also hard to, you know, stock Target shelves or whatever too.)

      • BoHan [#29]

        Mr. Sicha, you are doing the best job ever of making me feel like we are imaginary friends. Balk, hmmm. I'm thinking he might hit me up for liquor money but he's working on it. But yes. 100% agreed. I'm the world's crappiest salesman for the product I produce.

      • BoHan [#29]

        Did balk get home ok? I worry about him.

    • MisterHippity [#46]

      Amen to what you said. I like all of the current Gawker writers, and think you're doing great stuff.

    • HeyThatsMyBike [#500]

      Fek, I know I risk not getting my intended point across clearly here (I am not a professional writer, and I respect those that are! It is hard to do!), but I think a lot of the gawker-bashing that goes on here is more related to a personal preference thing, rather than hating the current writing staff. I know it is virtually impossible to not take it personally if you're currently spending the vast majority of your waking hours pouring yourself into working for something, and then reading about people purposely not reading it. I'm sure you're all really great writers! Because Nick really doesn't allow awful writers to last (hell, he doesn't even allow some really good writers to last!).

      But for me, there was no day that I just up and decided I wouldn't read it anymore, it was more of a gradual thing where the topical content was frankly no longer holding my interest, the commenting community was changing in culture enough that I no longer enjoyed being part of it, and the marked increase in posts kinda overwhelmed me. But that's just me! You still have a lot of traffic and a large, devoted commenting community who probably think you're all wonderful. With few exceptions (i.e. those commenters here who are holding an e-grudge against Denton), I think many of the people here who think it is "cool" to regard Gawker with contempt are actually in the same boat as I am. I wouldn't say we're holding it in contempt (nor that we think not liking a website anymore is 'cool,' because yikes, that would be pathetic), we're just no longer the target audience. And I'm ok with that!

      Anyway, carry on doing good work, and congrats on your talented additions!

  34. iplaudius [#1066]

    Huzzah! All the best to Doree and to Richard.

  35. Natan [#1967]

    I hated all Gawker writers after the first reign of Sicha.. Making an effort to figure out Balk's appeal, though.

 

Leave a Comment

Login Using:

Login to your account:

E-mail:
Password:

Register | Lost password?