Quantcast
 

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

31

How To Not Dress

Ladies, how often do you face this dilemma? You're going out on the town and you want to snag a man. But how much of yourself should you put on display? Show too little skin and you risk being ignored; show too much and things are sure to get rapey. Fortunately, Science is here with the solution: The correct answer is 40%. Also: "For the purposes of the study, each arm accounts for 10 per cent, each leg for 15 per cent and the torso for 50 per cent." Now you know.

31 Comments / Post A Comment

Ron Obvious
Ron Obvious (#351)

These studies from the Ed Gein Institute tend to vary in their results over time, I've noticed.

roboloki
roboloki (#1,724)

so, ladies should go out with both legs showing but cover one arm? i am so confused.

amuselouche
amuselouche (#448)

This study is clearly nothing more than blatant propaganda from the Asymetrical Lobby ("Big 80s").

garge
garge (#736)

That's only if you wear a face and neck mask--

DorothyMantooth

Who doesn't have a one-armed leotard in their wardrobe? Duh!

HiredGoons
HiredGoons (#603)

Just find Roman Polanski.

rj77
rj77 (#210)

*Applicable only to women ages 12-22. Blondes only, please.

Baroness
Baroness (#273)

Someone needs to tell Blake Lively. Legs OR tits dear, you're giving away the store.

MattP
MattP (#475)

Keep quiet you.

GiovanniGF
GiovanniGF (#224)

The head doesn't count?

wiilliiaamm
wiilliiaamm (#225)

I Rock Out With My Cock Out.

Some one do the math for me....

roboloki
roboloki (#1,724)

1.5 %

HiredGoons
HiredGoons (#603)

pi.

roboloki
roboloki (#1,724)

pi is sexy

HiredGoons
HiredGoons (#603)

It has nice curves.

poisonville
poisonville (#776)

"Teri Hatcher shows off about 40 per cent of her flesh - perfect for attracting the right amount of male attention"
The file photo accompanying this caption is unholy genius. I mean the stepladder...

poisonville
poisonville (#776)

[Click through to Daily Mail story for photo, I should add.]

Slava
Slava (#216)

HER FLESH!

Bittersweet
Bittersweet (#765)

So wearing panty hose counts as showing flesh?

Slava
Slava (#216)

What about a body suit that's at 60% opacity?!
Some questions need urgent answers!

beingiseasy
beingiseasy (#1,735)

Science! what an amazing system for classifications. it never ceases to amaze me. This is like finding out that the universe is ever-expanding.

HeyThatsMyBike

So a Snuggie with nothing under it and a large pair of granny panties would also leave about 40% of my body exposed. LOOK OUT BOYS, HERE I COME!!!

garge
garge (#736)

This justifies my leotard-and-long-gloves regimentals. Although by this definition, skank boots and a sleeveless turtleneck that hits at the hip would also be acceptable, so how can I be so sure?

Baboleen
Baboleen (#1,430)

What a-butta face?

mathnet
mathnet (#27)

About 40% of my flesh is exposed so I can get a boyfriend to buy me four whiskeys in one glass for washing out all my cuts on the other 60%. http://www.edithzimmerman.com/blog/?p=293

Alex Balk
Alex Balk (#4)

I thought that was her best one yet until I read the one that followed.

mathnet
mathnet (#27)

(retardedly tied)

Maevemealone
Maevemealone (#968)

Hmmm this helps me plan my Saturday night costume somewhat. I think I'll go for 42% just to be pushy.

cherrispryte
cherrispryte (#444)

headdesk.

Could Science get back to curing cancer, please?

Mary HK Choi
Mary HK Choi (#1,469)

i don't know guys, i'm wearing a catsuit that ends in a balaclava and i think it's working.

kitten_witawip

With skank boots?

Post a Comment

You must be logged-in to post a comment.

Login To Your Account