I couldn't sleep all night! I was tossing and turning, my mind afire, as I wondered: how are there 14 editors at the New York Times Book Review? This is not simple spite! I like the Book Review. Or at least I like it abstractly, not in the "Yay it's Sunday morning, here's the Book Review" kind of way. And yes, there is a hell of a lot of reading involved in it. But I'm pretty sure me and Maud and Lizzie and Mark Greif and a couple interns could get it done by Tuesday and then sort of just chillax on Wednesdays before starting all over again.
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
10
Each of them reads every 14th page.
Or works one day per fortnight.
That looks like my apartment.
The thing is that the New York Times Book Review isn't actually a good book review. It's the frickin New York TImes, they could really TRY to make you say "Yay it's Sunday morning," or at the very least, "Huh I wonder what [critic] has to say about [book]." Instead it's just a bunch of text they put together to go between publishers' advertisements.
How many NY Times editors does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
That's not a joke, I'm genuinely curious.
Sorry, that should be change a lightbulb.
Been a long time since I told a joke.
That's not funny at all. We know who you're really talking about.
Union rules require exempt staff only for maintenance work.
I hear the art department has a very good football team.
Once, long ago, editing was considered a separate job from writing, and as many as fourteen of these "editors" would be hired for each Book Review.