Comments on: Arthur Sulzberger: "Why do readers continue to embrace print?"

By: raymond

raymond — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:28:55 +0000

It's half true, not the whole true, for such change. It definitely will increase the share of circulation revenue because of significant drop of advertising.

By: CousinOliver

CousinOliver — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:26:29 +0000

That "Arthur and Janet" shtick is what gets me, especially since I couldn't get more than 4 grafs into this. Why not go whole hog and be known as "Art 'n' Jan"? By the way, does anyone know offhand what the average age of a NYT print subscriber is?

By: jfruh

jfruh — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:01:55 +0000

I am in fact interested in the future of the Times, but as it turns out I'm not actually eleven-paragraph-email interested.

By: KarenUhOh

KarenUhOh — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:56:38 +0000

I, for one, enjoy paying six dollars each Sunday to look at ads for $25,000 watches.