Quantcast
 

Monday, August 31, 2009

7

The Correct Ratio of the Income of the 'New Yorker' Reader to the National Debt

1/493rdRecently, Nick Paumgarten in the New Yorker had someone explain that if you represented the national debt as a basketball, that then the average American's income would be, in comparison, impossible to see with any microscope, no matter how powerful. Not entirely so, claims a physics dude in this week's letters to the editor! This physics dude, using an average income of $91K a year, cough, says that "the size of a grain representing the income of $91,000 is 1/493 the diameter of a nine-inch basketball, or about half a millimetre." See the above to-scale graphic, and be... reassured? Intrigued? Horrified?

7 Comments / Post A Comment

mathnet
mathnet (#27)

cough

BlinkyMcChuck
BlinkyMcChuck (#202)

I can totally see it, though.

CaptainFantastic

I'm going to need a bigger pixel.

KarenUhOh
KarenUhOh (#19)

Shouldn't they be using an A.B.A. basketball?

MisterHippity

What this really shows me is that I need to clean my computer screen.

I see little specks of income all over that circle.

lululemming
lululemming (#409)

$91,000?!? Next you will tell me the average New Yorker reader does not want to slap Sasha Frere-Jones upside the head!

buzzorhowl
buzzorhowl (#992)

Christ. That's 4.5 times my own yearly income.

Then again, I live in Virginia.

Post a Comment

You must be logged-in to post a comment.

Login To Your Account