Younger readers may not recall this, but there's an arcane phrase public figures once used when confronted with a rumor or supposition so ludicrous that it defied not only an attempt, but the effort required to make such an attempt, at correcting it: "I'm not going to dignify that with a response." That phrase went out of style back in about 1988, when Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis, accused of personally releasing convict Willie Horton from jail and then handing him a map of the Bay State's hottest spots for rape, made the purely rational assumption that voters would see the allegation as a clear and desperate attempt to play on racial fears through slander and innuendo and that he needn't bother to respond. Dukakis lost 40 states in that year's presidential election.
If more evidence were needed that no matter how absurd the accusation it must be denied-and more evidence was not needed, but it tells you a lot about the guy that even after having seen the Dukakis debacle close up, he still followed suit-John Kerry proved it in the election of 2004, when, as a decorated volunteer war hero facing a man whose record in the Alabama National Guard was deeply suspicious, he allowed smears about his service to go unanswered to the point where one of his greatest strengths became his greatest weakness.
Come we now to the birthers. I'm glad Robert Gibbs addressed this yesterday. I don't doubt he'll have to address it again. He is absolutely correct in saying that it won't make a difference, because those that can't be convinced won't be convinced. To once again reference the Stanley Fish essay we mentioned yesterday,
It isn't the legitimacy of Obama's birth certificate that's the problem for the birthers. The problem is again the legitimacy of a black man living in a big house, especially when it's the White House. Just as some in Durham and Cambridge couldn't believe that Gates belonged in the neighborhood, so does a vocal minority find it hard to believe that an African-American could possibly be the real president of the United States.And that's exactly what this is about. Personally, I think Gibbs should come out one day and say, "You know what? You're right. Barack Obama was not born in the United States. In fact, he was not born on Earth at all. Barack Obama comes from a distant planet that was faced with destruction; moments before it exploded, his father Jor-El Obama, placed him in a rocket headed towards Earth in hopes that he might survive and help to build a better world. DEAL WITH IT." I mean, at least that would be kind of funny, right? Especially once the folks on the talk shows started complaining that Jor-El was actually white, and why is the Obama administration trying to take away all our white heroes, etc. Jesus, what a world.

People get so hung up on technicalities. I don't give a fuck where Obama was born. He's the President. Live with it, assholes.
Give these "birther" (instantly entering the coin of realm as potentially more doofus-sounding that "tweet") fuckers their own two or three counties in Eastern New Mexico or Central Nevada so they can plant a ragged flag and inbreed themselves into the Master Race who can erect beer can pyramids in devotion to their One True God.
well it's in the Constitution, so I'd gather it's pretty important. I like the Jor-El Obama approach.
"I don't understand the question, and I won't respond to it." Lucille Bluth, on being offered "plate or platter" at Klimpy's.
Or are we over Arrested Development quotes by now?
Fun Trivia: the "natural born" clause of the Constitution was written specifically to make sure that Alexander Hamilton could never be President, as he was born in the Caribbbean. He was Washington's aide-de-camp and deeply distrusted by Jefferson and others because of his political ambition and openly expressed intent to create an American empire (as opposed to a federation). So enlightened were our Founding Fathers...
Obama brought up the Krypton story last year: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vws9fTtQgz4
Politics of distraction again.
But if it's all about a black man in the White House, how to explain Alan Keyes' lawsuit? I'm not defending the birthers; I just don't think race is the primary factor.
Well, Keyes is insane, so that's the primary factor there. But don't you see racism in the birthers? Seems obvious to me.
Living amongst, and being related to, many birthers, my observation is that the largest number of them are not hard core racists. Though there are many of them too. Really, they are hard core "conservatives" who have this vision of am america where the traditional values are getting thrown out and "the rules" don't apply anymore. A lot of this has to do with this population's (white male) continuing de-empowerment to minorities and women and the highly educated. And what they see as their continuing loss as the central focus of what it means to be "American." So they see themselves as a minority, as victims. It is kind of like how Christians see themselves as a set-upon religion in the US and they use this language of "war on christmas" and stuff to whip themselves into a frenzy of victimization. It is essentially a way to complain.
I know some birthers, and no, I don't see racism in them. I agree, to some extent, with Sauer - these are people who see Obama as UnAmerican, not because of his race, but because of his politics. What has them upset is not that there's a black man in the White House, but that there's a Socialist (in their view) in the White House. (And pace, Sauer, one of the most passionate birthers I know is a highly educated woman; I don't think it's simply about the disempowerment of the white male.) There may indeed be racist birthers; I'm just working from my (admittedly limited) experience when I say that there are other factors involved.
But of course they're really trying to bait a crazy to go shoot the president, like they did with Tiller.
For the good of the Constitution, of course.
For so many reasons, I really wish Obama's mom was still with us.
How on Earth did a SarahPAC ad wind up on this post?
(Apologies for this bit of unimportant conversation, but it really threw me.)
National Review, oddly enough, has the definitive quote on this issue: "The hallmark of a conspiracy theory is that a lack of evidence for the theory is taken as yet more evidence for the theory."
My ads are for a Criminal Justice education program and for some solar power company.