It is a bad sign for your stardom, and your sense of place in the cultural moment, when you are a major tabloid pop star and you whip out your breasts for your new video and the Internet doesn't explode.
The topless photos of Britney Spears-published yesterday in News of the World-haven't even been posted on Perez Hilton. (Drudge is also a no-show at the Britney pics party.) Those of us who have labored in the salt mines of the gossip blogs easily recall a time only some months ago when we would have been texted to attend to our laptops when some Britney topless action occurred on a weekend. Now there is a giant gaping silence. (Part of the problem is that her non-breast parts, as photographed, look so unbelievably terrible. Perhaps everyone feels bad!)
This is sort of embarrassing for everyone! It is pretty much like someone ripped off her top at a party and everyone was like "Oh boy, call her a cab right now, she is bringing us down and this is not sophomore year of college."
It's like looking into a mirror. A funhouse mirror that gives you Midwestern arms, but still.
Guess she's not real ticklish.
http://gawker.com/news/britney-spears/omg-britney-sex-tape-omg-probablymaybe-213240.php
I think that covers BOTH this and the previous post.
True!
Ha! Oh man. We were all so much thinner then, me included. Also a bummer that happened before we started getting paid by the pageview.
Yesterday at some back patio barbecue bar thing about ten of us were showing each other our underwear, as immature gay men will. (Least mature being my friend E and I, both going commando, but still lowering trou enough to accentuate the point.) Meanwhile, A dropped trou to reveal pink knit boxers which had shifted so that the family jewels were revealed. His "partner" [I hate that word.] soon took him home as well.
Is being escorted away from the party now to be known as a "Britney" moment?
Let us solemnly hope not.
I agree with you about "partner", especially now that it has been relaunched as a participle, "partnered", as in "I am openly partnered".
(N.B. I am not partnered, openly or otherwise.)
And another problem: She alleges to enjoy London.
Those poor little temporary tattoos don't stand a chance against the awesome power of Britney's nipples.
At least, that's what I've heard. I haven't looked at the pictures myself.
Yeah, but you got a seeing web-eye porno dog to do it for you. and for shame, you, a father....
I thought Britney was blond. What happened?
honestly, I think it's partially because the photos are from 2007. She's just not that shocking anymore. She's a mother of two, for chrissakes.