Quantcast
 

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

43

This Is Awl Version .02

Oh, some iterations here today on the site itself. As we said early on, we are not going to get too attached to our digital face. It will change and we will experiment ceaselessly. Some things will please some; others will please The Others. (There are still two episodes of Lost sitting on my Tivo! When will I find the time?) This website itself, as you have probably gathered, is an experiment. So, fellow scientists, send all complaints, suggestions and beefs (along with your browser and OS info!) to notes at the awl. (Also, the office of David Cho would like to thank Rebecca Wiener for her invaluable assistance.)

43 Comments / Post A Comment

KarenUhOh
KarenUhOh (#19)

Where's your awl? I have an ingrown hair I need to excise.

Abe Sauer
Abe Sauer (#148)

If pictures of Gisele was proven to be a circulation black death for magazines, why is The Awl running her article as a promo atop their new purty site? Why does The Awl hate success?

Abe Sauer
Abe Sauer (#148)

"were" proven. (I apparently, hate grammar.)

Jasmine
Jasmine (#8)

I'm also a bit put off by Giselle up there. I clicked into the site and my first thought was, "what is this, Gawker?"

That's not, I think, what you want. Though it's the most viewed, I thought we were trying to, you know, stay away from that celebrity shit nobody really cares about. Even if it does vaguely have to do with print circulation or something.

Choire Sicha

It's a funny post by Alex!! That's why I put it up there.

sigerson
sigerson (#179)

Pretty. I like the redesign.

sansraisins
sansraisins (#178)

ditto (and I look forward to seeing the logo when it loads)

boricuaintexas

You need to add a link somewhere for newcomers and for those of us who wanted to subscribe to your daily newsletter, but were too lazy to do it the first time.

withelectrolytes

Not too shabby! Though I too liked the awl graphic.

Choire Sicha

Me too, BUT, a new mystery logo coming soon!

propertius
propertius (#361)

Let it be an evil species of bird.

Carrying an awl to drop on its target.

kitten_witawip

Who won the $100?

42ways
42ways (#884)

I am just happy that this redesign didn't get rid of the '15 More Minutes of Fart Jokes' banner under the 'L’année dernière à Marienbad' ad. so great. seriously.

shorty
shorty (#885)

Aw, you beat me to it!
I am also all for it as long as all new versions contain "15 More Minutes of Fart Jokes."

bshep
bshep (#746)

..unless they get Asswiper sponsorship. I find that asswiper ads are best without the extra fart jokes.

negative nancy

Definitely loving this running gag.

Setec Astrology

I liked being able to navigate from post to post without having to go back out to the homepage. Is there a reason that's gone?

David Cho
David Cho (#3)

It kind of got lost in the shuffle, but it will (most likely) be back very soon...

mathnet
mathnet (#27)

STRONGLY AGREE

narnio
narnio (#38)

Still really happy with the favicon.

brent_cox
brent_cox (#40)

I like it very much, but will miss the initial minimalist version deeply - nostalgia, already.

propertius
propertius (#361)

Me too. It had a scrappy look, like WebX forums ca. 1997 or so.

Misty pixel memories and all that.

But as long as they don't a institute gold star system, I can deal.

Aatom
Aatom (#74)

"as they don’t a institute gold star system, I can deal."

Ugh, for real. I like this neo-Awl.

Hobbesian
Hobbesian (#255)

On a purely functional note, my apostrophes look like "'". Although I'm running IE 8, which admittedly blows goats.

HeyThatsMyBike

Same problem here. I hate IE8, but my work loves it. Given that the very reason for having this lovely website is presumably to give the underemployed something fun/enjoyable to do/read in the 8 hours they are chained to an IE8-only computer, I hope it gets fixed. It is making my brain sore.

katiebakes
katiebakes (#32)

Three's a trend!

MisterHippity

So THAT'S how you make an apostrophe in HTML. I learned something today!

joeclark
joeclark (#651)

You just type your apostrophe is how you “make an apostrophe in HTML.” We don’t use character entities anymore (one word: Unicode).

kurtck
kurtck (#887)

Can you get rid of that bit of Facebookish blue line at the top? Then I will be happy.

jaimealyse
jaimealyse (#647)

It looks a little Gawkery in a way I can't quite pin down - the header layout, perhaps? And when I'm reading something up at the top of the page, it feels a little claustrophobic, the article all pinned in between two ads, all the header business, whatever's happening on that right sidebar. Maybe too much sidebar? Too much canary yellow?

Just yesterday I was talking to a friend about The Awl, and he was like, "You mean that hideously designed Gothamist ripoff?" And I was like, "It's more a hideously designed highbrow Gawker," but I'll be honest, I came to like the anti-design design. I even got used to reading in Times New Roman. Not saying you should regress, but don't look like every other blog.

jaimealyse
jaimealyse (#647)

Also, could someone teach me how to get an icon up in this shit?

missdelite
missdelite (#625)

gravatar.com

jaimealyse
jaimealyse (#647)

RAWR!

Rod T
Rod T (#33)

If you use one of those shirtless, hairless, brainless apes from "The Pride" as my "contributar" it will be very cognitive dissonancy.

Not Bob
Not Bob (#113)

Make it four on the "'" thingy, although I am using IE 7, not 8.

Hez
Hez (#147)

DITTO (TRITTO?) ON THE NAVIGATIONAL AIDS. Next story/previous story arrows at the top AND bottom of the page, please.

phlox
phlox (#204)

I already miss the squinting!

major disaster

Well, I like it.

KarenUhOh
KarenUhOh (#19)

Can we get paragraph breaks back for the comments? Because I'm all about pacing.

Are you even reading this?

jaimealyse
jaimealyse (#647)

Ooh, I second that. Unless inserting html works... But even still. The enter key should do its work.

jaimealyse
jaimealyse (#647)

(Inserting html seems not to work.)

jaimealyse
jaimealyse (#647)

Well, sometimes.

Post a Comment

You must be logged-in to post a comment.

Login To Your Account