The belt she's wearing used to belong to me before I purged my closet of things I should never have had in the first place. She definitely pillaged the clothing-donation bin on Washington Ave. & St. Johns in Prospect Heights.
Oh, I'm supposed to be commenting on that other site? My bad.
Also: is there a template that forces the commenter to include "as a heterosexual female" or "as a heterosexual male" at the start of each comment? Weird.
As a heterosexual white male atheist over 40 carnivore who watches between 10 and 20 hours of television a week and describes himself as, “somewhat satisfied†with my current phone service, I find her sunglasses preposterous.
As a bicurious female who is generally assumed to be a homosexual male, I hate her everything!
(But especially what looks like her chipped toenail polish. Ugh!)
Back in the olden days on alt.fashion any post that began with "as a woman" was basically code for cross-dressing man of either orientation who wanted to talk about ladies underwear.
The belt she's wearing used to belong to me before I purged my closet of things I should never have had in the first place. She definitely pillaged the clothing-donation bin on Washington Ave. & St. Johns in Prospect Heights.
Oh, I'm supposed to be commenting on that other site? My bad.
Also: is there a template that forces the commenter to include "as a heterosexual female" or "as a heterosexual male" at the start of each comment? Weird.
Ha, I kind of enjoy that! I sort of wish it was mandatory everywhere.
Also I HATE her belt.
As a hat-ero-sexual avatar, I would find it limiting.
As a heterosexual white male atheist over 40 carnivore who watches between 10 and 20 hours of television a week and describes himself as, “somewhat satisfied†with my current phone service, I find her sunglasses preposterous.
As a bicurious female who is generally assumed to be a homosexual male, I hate her everything!
(But especially what looks like her chipped toenail polish. Ugh!)
Back in the olden days on alt.fashion any post that began with "as a woman" was basically code for cross-dressing man of either orientation who wanted to talk about ladies underwear.
It's just too easy to criticize someone who forgot to wear pants.
A "tuna surprise," as it were.
as a bisexual female, i think she should be wearing boots with that outfit.
Uggs or ankle boots?
cowboy boots.
WHITE ones!
yecccccccchhhh to both outfit and concept
As a heterosexual male, I don't understand this at all.
You could make 4 or 5 Shamwows out that dress though.
Call me Tiresias. Today only.
And I don't understand this, or anything else, for that matter.
*Filled all four positions of the matrix. Serially, of course.
As a--
Shit. NOW what do I do?
If she were a model the hemline wouldn't be a problem.
Never mind the girl, the UES is kind of the cold shower of Manhattan neighborhoods, isn't it?