Quantcast
 

Thursday, May 14, 2009

7

Unemployment Trends Since 1989: Really, Really Bad

New unemployment numbers this morning saw 637,000 new initial jobless claims last week. The number of people collecting unemployment nationally is now at 6.56 million. Disturbing: the number of those who are "long-term" unemployed (perhaps briefly) surpassed the number of short-term unemployed. These numbers do not include those of us who are working part-time, or have given up on filing for unemployment. But what does the jobs and income situation look like in context of the last twenty years? Unemployment
The last twenty years of employment, through April 1, 2009, expressed as percent change year-to-year.

UNEMPLOYMENT
The last twenty years, through April 1, 2009, of changes in number of jobs in construction, expressed as change from previous year, in thousands.

Unemployment
The last twenty years, through April 1, 2009, of changes in number of jobs in finance, expressed as change from previous year, in thousands.

L.A.
Los Angeles County, change in employment since last year, expressed in percent.

Unemployment
The last twenty years, through April 1, 2009, of percent changes in hourly income for all private industry jobs. Note how the downturn in growth lags far behind the recessions.

7 Comments / Post A Comment

theheckle
theheckle (#621)

Can we talk about the cat again?

Abe Sauer
Abe Sauer (#148)

So, wait, does this mean my $1000 loan is going to cost me two blowjobs a year from now instead of one?

Throw in a chart that's just called "newspapers" and it will make the others look better. Related: Depressing.

Also, for those of us old enough to really remember how bad it seemed, 1992 FINALLY looks not so bad.

BlinkyMcChuck
BlinkyMcChuck (#202)

Why the, uh, LA close-up? Are you guys just putting us on about being in NYC? Are you really in a big house in Silverlake?

Choire Sicha

That is mainly because I am SHOCKED that unemployment in L.A. county is over 10%. That is basically like 2% less than Thunderdome.

BlinkyMcChuck
BlinkyMcChuck (#202)

It's time for Tina to put her wig on and do a number, and we watch as the crowds scream....

delrayser
delrayser (#319)

Depressing economic statistics? Graphs? Who the hell do you think you are, Paul Krugman?

Kataphraktos
Kataphraktos (#226)

Actually, hourly earnings drop when the economy recovers because employers start hiring again. Instead of paying overtime to existing employees to cover for those laid off, they hire new folks, which means hourly earnings drop for each employee.

Post a Comment

You must be logged-in to post a comment.

Login To Your Account