New Republican Attack Ad Is Insanely Insane
The out of control insane Republican Party has a new ad! It asks if the first 100 days of the Obama administration have led you to believe that the Pentagon is going to be blown up and how we will live without Guantanamo and if foreign people are going to burn the American flag and EAT YOUR BABIES. Oh and also how we will get by without torturing people. WHICH IS INSANE. The Republican party is clearly trying to rebrand itself as the party of torture, an identity which they are welcome to!
Did that one potato head really say that by leaking the CIA memos we had taken interrogation methods "off the table"?
So the terrorists will now PRACTICE being waterboarded, until it loses its persuasive effect?
This is how to come out of the closet when you haven't gotten over hating the world.
Wow, Stephen Colbert really knows how to rock those parodies. This one is a little over the top though, know? There's a lot of war and torture in it, and I'm not sure anyone would think a political party would be so into that stuff.
What exactly is the point of this ad? I mean, really – what are they hoping it will do for them?
Wow. Tony Scott's new Will Smith movie looks bad-ass. I can't wait to see it this summer.
(On a side note: I kind of understand the Right going ape over the Chavez shaking hands thing ONLY as a counter reaction to how a few years ago the left took a mostly out of context picture of Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam and went "Ooooooooh Looooook!!!!" I know it's not exactly the same, given the later invasion etc etc. But still…)
So first they shell out a few hundred grand for Palin to get a new wardrobe, and now they're commissioning John Williams to score their ads? Are the Chrysler accountants running the GOP?
sauer – when Rumsfeld shook Saddam's hand, he was there to provide support to Saddam in the war against Iran.
Yes. He was there in an official capacity as part of the US government's overall diplomatic strategy at that time. As I said, not exactly the same. But it could certainly go very wrong with Chavez in the future and this act could easily be taken out of context then. That's all.