Wednesday, April 29th, 2009
17

Gays: "Bea Arthur Should Have Been On Every Page Of People Magazine"

I love it when gays go crazy. And now they have, over not enough attention to the passing of Bea Arthur.

This is some crazy gay action:

People Magazine's annual 100 Most Beautiful issue is out and they got it all wrong! That picture of Bea Arthur should be the entire cover. Actually, Bea should be on every single page, including the back. Okay, maybe not every single page. They could've devoted one page to Salma Hayek's magnificent married chichis, but the rest should've been Bea. They also should have temporarily changed the name of the magazine to BEAPLE.


Instead of doing that, People put Kelly Bundy on the cover which really doesn't bother me, but the rest of the 100 does. The list includes: Halle Berry (BORING), Carrie Underwears (BORINGER), Angelina Jolie (BORINGEST), Melissa Rycroft (BORINGESTER) and JLo (Are you asleep yet?). Seriously, that is like a big bowl of salad without the dressing or croutons. Or even Bac-Os. If they weren't going to devote their lives to Bea this week, they should've at least filled the magazine with the truly most beautiful people in the world.

17 Comments / Post A Comment

IBentMyWookie (#133)

With apologies to Gabriel Delahaye, I have no problem with this.

mathnet (#27)

Oh, her last name is Rycroft? I had no idea. Or interest.

Gays are right. Also, Newsbeak.

mathnet (#27)

Oh shit, that might make beaple think it's a special issue on birds! I meant, National Beaographic.

If Michael K was really serious wouldn't he have changed the name of his site to Bea-Listed?

mathnet (#27)

kitten_witawip is correct! Regardless of my inability to reply directly to him/her!

I see what you mean. I am a her, btw.

propertius (#361)

If they hold Castro Halloween this year, I'll bet that lots of guys will be going as her. The last time she visited, they surely did.

Fredrick (#268)

I read Michael K's writing in the voice of my mother (my mother is a black woman).

ljnd (#86)

Yes, this "there is no more direct replying after the first direct reply" is a bit weird – are you trying to prevent too many nested conversations? We are meticulous people!

ljnd (#86)

And I MEANT to reply to mathnet. Damnit.

I think you have to hit the first reply and then it threads it in order.

ljnd (#86)

You see, but by now I've totally forgotten what I wanted to say.

KarenUhOh (#19)

I think we'll be seeing Bacos on a lot of magazine covers next week.

I've decided to take this in the thinly-veiled-swing-at Owen-Thomas spirit in which I assume it was intended.

I'm a straighto and I don't find this at all gay. Bea bealongs to everybody.

Patrick M (#404)

To be fair, people who don't know they're gay yet are also upset about this.

Post a Comment